Zdravim, ale ked tam ziadny asfalt nie je, nemozete si ho v OSM vymyslat. Ak tam navigacia nenaviguje, asi ma nejaky dovod (napr. nejde cez nespevneny povrch ked mate cestny bicykel). Mala by umoznovat si nastavit preferencie pre konkretneho pouzivatela.

V kazdom pripade, vymyslanie si nepravdivych dat je v OSM zakazane.

Suhlasim, toto znacenie v CHKO (a ake su vlastne zakonne pravidla) by sa malo dohodnut na mailing liste, lebo napr. aj tento usek si prekresluje kto chce ako chce a manipujule data aby uspokojil nejaku navigaciu. Uz to zacina byt neunosne.

Aha, zase svojske zmeny podla Vasich predstav, hoci ste neboli na mieste ani ste si neprecitali historiu tych ciest.
Tak toto odstranim ako celok.

Hm, bez odpovede. Cize Vy ste chceli dat este prisnejsi zakaz ako je 'private' ale namiesto toho ste dali volnejsi (povolenie dostane lubovolny turista). Nevidim logiku. Okrem toho ak treba povolenie, na dopravnej znacke to nie je uvedene (staci vozidla vlastnikov (asi ste nepochopili, ze tu nie je vlastnikom stat, ale su tam aj sukromne lesy)).

Zdravim, preco osm.org/way/1285196502 ked uz je skola na bode? Alebo teda lepsie by bolo zrusit ten bod, ak vieme cely areal a presunut znacky na areal.

Tie znacky 'level' na castiach budovy nemaju velmi zmysel (hlavne ked cast ma 3 poschodia). Mozno ste mysleli layer.

Trochu to skusim vylepsim.

Podla toho co pise inde ide skor o nejake 100-rocne mapy, s nejasnou relevanciou pre dnesnu dobu (neviem ci niekto tie nazvy pouziva a pozna).

A tiez napr.
osm.org/way/966591074 som zakreslil planovany projekt "Nove Lido", urcite nejde o ziadne Elyzium, ktore je uz zakreslene na bode osm.org/node/11445334213 . Takze tiez trochu opatrnejsie.

Thanks for the information.
What do you mean with you "are not listed"?

OK, thanks. But there are several problems with your addition:
-If you put capacity=40 it seems to mean the whole parking lot, not just a single parking space. Thus the tag amenity=parking (not parking_space).
-Next, on aerial imagery there are more than 40 parking spaces visible.
-Then, you put access=permit, which means anyone going there needs to apply for a permit from the owner, but the permit is usually granted to anyone (like general public, random tourists). I am not sure if that is the case, if anyone can really go there. You probably mean access=private, which means only the owner of the facility can go (park) there and those few special guests whom he gives permission.
-You added the name of "Zero Bypass Limited" on the building. It only means the building has such name. It does not mean any company with such name works there. If there is such a company, it needs more tags, e.g. office=company. Also, maybe the whole site (osm.org/way/1306227166) belongs to this company and the name could be put there.
So tell me what the situation is there.

Hi, what is the point of adding footway:surface and cycleway:surface on roads that already have surface and its value is correct for both foot and cycleway? Especially on roads where no cycleway actually exists, which you should have seen if you were there as you claim.

Dobry postreh, firma naozaj zmenila nazov. Upracem to aj na budove technickej kontroly za nou.

Thanks for the additions, but the values should be in the local language (Slovak). Also, you do not just throw all the info into name and description, if it can be split into the proper tags like 'manufacturer', 'model', wikidata, etc.

Tie zahradky medzi domami zrejme nebudu farmland.

Zdravim, ked je v krizovatke semafor a funguje, znacka daj prednost v jazde neplati. Neznacil by som teda obe naraz. Inak navigacia pridava dalsiu zbytocnu penalizaciu. Lebo neviem ako ma vediet kedy znacka plati a kedy nie.

Zdravim a aku asi vezu? Je to pozorovacia veza (tower:type=observation), to neznamena, ze vyhliadka pre turistov (tourism=viewpoint). Takze to bolo dobre.

A osm.org/relation/2267855 je aka krizova cesta? Nema ziadne zastavenia a ide tak okolo 6 kaplniek. To ste si zase len vymysleli?

Amenity mozno OK, ale preco menite typ budovy, ked to ziadna kaplnka nie je?
'shrine' bolo podla mna spravne, tak dokazte preco nie. Taktiez ste mohli vidiet v historii objektu, ze uz som to parkrat opravoval.

Zase demolacia spravnych building=shrine na historic=wayside_shrine. Zrejme ste tam vobec neboli a trieskate znacenie od stola (pritom to vidite v historii, ze som to zamerne tak oznacil), alebo neskumate popisy znaciek a znacky ktorym nerozumiete mazete. Co je v OSM zakazane.

No vidite, ani obec sa k tomu nehlasi. Takze kym nevieme, nie je dovod tam bicykle povolovat. Ked je tam znacena cyklotrasa (ale nie cesticka pre cyklistov), vzdy je mozne bicykel kusok potlacit. Takze nezabudnite vsetky tie cesty opravit. Dakujem

Na osm.org/way/671089650 je zakaz vjazdu vsetkym vozidlam (tak preco to davate prec). Nezda as mi, ze by tam bola znacka o zosadnuti z bicykla. A na stlpiku zakaz vjazdu motorovym vozidlam logicky nie je, kedze je tam povoleny vjazd vozidlam s povolenim. Prestante si uz vymyslat. Ak takto nicite cele Slovensko tak dakujem pekne.

A ten noexit=yes na juznom konci Kostolnej? Ak tam mozu pokracovat chodci, tak tam nie je slepa ulica, v zmysle OSM.

A podla coho na tu cast Kostolnej od Druzstevnej na juh mozu ist bicykle a dokonca aj kone? Je tam nejaka dopravna znacka, ktora prebija pristup podla zakona?