Aha, cize iba Vas nazor je spravny a nikto Vas nesmie kontrolovat, resp. doplnit a vylepsovat.
To ze Vas niekto stalkuje je Vas subjektivny dojem. Je to proste bezna prax pravidelnejsich maperov sa pytat zmeny, ktorych dovod je nejasny. Nemyslim, ze som ja nieco porusil. Okrem toho, ja som Vase zmeny neodstranil bez stopy, ale spracoval inak, cize Vase vylepsenia (ktore nimi boli), v OSM nadalej existuju. Cize o ziadny vandalizmus nejde.
Naopak, Vy pomenite veci a potom ich neviete zdovodnit (vobec nereagujete), to je vandalizmus.

Otazka na zdroj je uplne legitimna, pozrite osm.wiki/Cs:Key:source . Taktiez, to ze nereagujete na komentare (a ked uz, tak len sposobom ako tu, ze nic nezodpoviete, len sa vseobecne ohradzujete a vyhrazate) je problem. A toto su objektivne dovody (pravidla OSM), na zaklade ktorych moze niekto zacat riesit Vas.

That is true, too many members (not relations) may complicate objects and slow down. Yes, big polygons could be cut into smaller ones. Sadly some of the forests in Slovakia were imported in the past and are imprecise so need to be improved now.

You always had to add inner members of multipolygons if there were holes in the object (whatever it was, like building or lake). People just were lazy to do it for forests, as the default rendering on osm.org was hiding the errors. Now it no longer does it.

Zdroj nazvu? Ortofoto asi nie.

Prosim nedavajte 'brand' na bankomaty, staci operator. Ak teda nemate na mysli vyrobcu bankomatu.

See, splitting or not splitting the roundabout is both fine :)

I do not see a problem is whole roundabout is part of the route relation. Also JOSM editor sees no problem.

But the will become a problem if route contains a roundabout and then some other user splits the roundabout and does not fix the route relations afterwards.

Hi, you do not need to cut roundabouts into individual segments if they have the same properties along the whole circle. You do not need to do it for public transport relations.

Takze zmena jedneho opisneho nazvu na iny (osm.org/changeset/138513313) . A zase bez zdroja.

Zaujimave, ze Vy sami sa tym neriadite.

Thanks, that looks like an error and is already gone.

Tie patria na jednotlive nastupistia, a kazde moze mat ine vlastnosti.
A hlavne public_transport=platform na stanici je v konflikte s public_transport=station, ktore tam ma byt. Opravil som to.

Zdravim, preco vsetky tie znacky ako platform,bus_stop,shelter,bin aj na objekte celej stanice? To vyzera byt nespravne.

Zdravim, preco tato zmena? Aky je zdroj?

Podla tabule osm.org/node/1801170745 by to mohla byt cela budova.

Zdravim, pridat wikidata na bod, ktory ma len adresu a ziadny nazov je divne. Nemalo by to byt na dome, o ktorom je polozka wikidata? Ktory je to dom? Cely arcibiskupsky urad?

And especially without specifying any access permissions, which by default means only private access. Which seems not true at this parking (it is for customers).

Hi, you didn't touch the German embassy in this changeset. And why duplicating the lift gates like osm.org/node/2030427945/ ?

Hi, thanks for the additions.
However, please pay more attention next time as there are these errors:
osm.org/node/6885630129 the operator as written on the door is EDI777,s.r.o. not Batoni group (that one is just written on the label). Also the name on the restaurant is written as MAMULI.

The name of osm.org/node/8225963826 is La Bella Carolina, not Garolina.

Also do not remove source=survey from objects, if you have seen them on the ground (surveyed). It is the correct source.

No, podla Vasej upravy ste prave znacky signalizujuce, ze je tam stavba odmazali, cize ste stavbu zrusili/ukoncili. Tak ste asi cestu chceli obnovit, no neuspesne.

Pozor, odmazali ste aj highway=service, cim uz to nie je cesta.