Zdravim, dakujem za vylepsenie stavby Slavina. Ale tie building:color na bodoch su zbytocne, staci to na plochach budov (kde je building, ci building:part).
Opravil som.

neighbourhood "Area of the Bratislava Castle"? Made up object?

And again, creating new road without preserving all the attributes, damaging bus routes on that road, creating incorrect both-way roads where they are oneway.

Are you so inexperienced or are you intentionally damaging data?

More experiments? Good that you put the trunk back to primary.

And removing Kamenne namestie, one of the most important squares in the city. Can't you really pay attention to what you are doing?

Making up your own road classification again?

Reverted.

A track with no 'sport' tag? You could just have copied the tags from the rest of the track already mapped to make this change useful.
But thanks at least for noticing the missing segment.

Please use "ESRI world imagery" as imagery source in Bratislava, not Bing aerial imagery. The former one is newer so using the latter may cause you to add no longer existing objects.

Service roads going into gates and then suddenly changing into footways in the front yard? Yeah, right.

Have you ever been to the place?
Why are you making up these changes and destroying our data?

If you are a newcomer, please learn the rules on the wiki and start with simple objects, do not rewrite stuff in centres of properly mapped cities. Thanks.

Another random road classification change?
Those roads are pedestrian zones with the right traffic sign.

Yes, motor vehicles can drive on some of them, which is clearly marked with motor_vehicle=yes tag. So there is no need to change them to residential, if that was your point.

Please stop doing these random and incorrect changes, also without referencing the source where you got them from. But they definitely do not reflect reality.

Reverting whole changeset.

Another completely wrong changeset.
You claim to use "Bing aerial imagery", but you can't see the classification of a road from aerial imagery. So why do you touch the road type and create fictional higher level roads?
Most primary/secondary/tertiary roads in Slovakia have a 'ref' tag with a number. You did not add this one so it is clear you just made the roads up.

Reverting.

The cycleway around city centre of Bratislava is complete nonsense in the way you tagged it. You must not just throw a new road onto existing ones.
You tag bicycle=yes or cycleway=shared_lane, or other proper tags according to traffic signs on roads that are already there. Only if you find new build road specifically for cycleway only, you can add a highway=cycleway.

I will remove it all.

There is no common junction between way 37409848 and the tunnel under the hill (way 411125992). Pay attention to not adding such errors.

Also, the garden way 369605107 already had a wall, so why adding a new and incorrect one? There is probably no wall at the parts where the garden touches the buildings.

Hi, this change is completely incorrect. All those links are classified as "primary" in the official road database, so why are you changing them? Also, a link going from secondary to primary road would also logically be primary_link (OSM wiki does not specify rules) even if not going by official classification, so what is your point?

Hi, please more meaningful changeset comment. "Edit in BA" description on 100 of changesets is useless. Thanks.

Danke :)

Dakujem, takze tato druha lekaren v Cubicone je duplicita: osm.org/node/2443987388 ?

A tato lekaren v Poliklinike Mlynska dolina uz neexistuje:
osm.org/node/1996166145 ?
Namiesto nej je tato: osm.org/node/4339519775 ? Mozete prosim potvrdit/ overit? Dakujem.

Dobry den, naozaj su v budove Cubiconu dve lekarne s nazvom Rubicon (odlisny nazov ako Cubicon)? A "Poliklinika Mlynska dolina" tiez uz zakreslena bola takze ju nebolo treba pridavat, este k tomu ako nemocnicu (cim nie je). Skor keby ste mohli overit, ci v Poliklinike naozaj este stale funguju dve lekarne, hlavne ta Alibabacentrum je otazna.
Dakujem.

Ale ta brana je na ceste, takze sa po nej neda dalej prejst? Alebo sa po ceste dokola da prejst, ale ta brana je vedla cesty na plote smerom od cesty k jazeru?

Aha tak potom je to access=private (vstup len pre vlastnika (moze byt aj firma ci klub) a komu on da suhlas). Urcite tam tu branu nechajme, nech to je zrejme, ze tam je nejake obmedzenie. Pozriem ci na nejakych fotkach nevidno ten plot.

Zdravim ta brana je len tak na ceste aj ked tam nie je zakresleny ziadny plot?
A access=permissive znamena, ze tam moze ist kazdy, pokial vlastnik suhlas neodvola. Nechceli ste povedat nieco ine?