Zdravim, je cesta osm.org/way/161639566 este stale uzavreta?
Napr. na https://poprad.dnes24.sk/dobre-spravy-pre-motoristov-pod-tatrami-v-plane-dalsich-sedem-usekov-ciest-271758 pisu, ze III/3107 v tomto useku idu opravovat. Viete to nejako overit?

Ja myslim, ze JOSM zobrazuje historiu spravne a nie ste na tejto relacii poslednym editorom, napriek tomu je zrejme, ze zmenu type ste urobili Vy. Mozno len omylom, ale pre istotu sa pytam. Je to jasne vidiet napr. tu: osm.org/relation/2413081/history , hladajte verzia #10.

Hi, 'simpler' is relative, and while oneway on roundabout may seem redundant, it at least isn't wrong and is safer. It is similar to the implied oneway on highway=motorway. Not all applications assume that. So it is always safer to add oneway and e.g. toll explicitly (whether yes or no).
I don't think JOSM valudator has such a rule. I always add oneway onto roundabouts and the JOSM validator never reports it. Maybe the Osmose test is outdated or wrongly claim this check is from JOSM.

Hi, what was wrong on roundabout way 662224412? Why is removing oneway=yes useful (I know junction=roundabout implies oneway), but how does Osmose flag it as error?

Hi, there is no need to split roundabouts (e.g. way 678299916) into segments, if all have the same tags. You needlessly break bus route relations.

Hi, the 3D shape of the building is still incorrect, the way 5215475 should have the maximum height of all the parts, if e.g. way 277448084 is only a building:part. I know you didn't want to fix it all, but adding the incorrect height and building:levels may have actually made things worse. Also, why do you think the building parts have incorrect heights? Do you have some source for the 3D shape of the building?

And that studio has no name and does not fill the whole building?
I just mean if you wanted to split the studio from the building (which has interesting properties/tags of its own), then it needs to be done logically.
So thanks for changing my office=telecommunication to amenity=studio, but you did a large semantic change, different from just fixing the tag.

Zdravim, dakujem za aktualizaciu povolenych rychlosti na zelezniciach.
Prosim davajte vsak pozor, tu pri Bohumine ste vytvorili nove useky kolajnic, ale odstranili ste ich (zabudli priadat) do relacii vlakovych liniek ako napr.
osm.org/relation/3779843. Pride mi to divne, lebo JOSM by na toto upozornil, resp. automaticky urobil spravnu vec.
Ak je to mozne, prosim aktualizujte si JOSM, verzia 10526, ktoru pouzivate, je velmi zastarala. Dakujem

Zdravim, preco na zeleznicnej trati Púchov – Strelenka (– Horní Lideč) zmena z type=route na type=public_transport? type=public_transport nema nic spolocne s relaciami zeleznicnych trati:
osm.wiki/Cs:Tag:type%3Dpublic_transport

Hi, if you fixed power lines in this changeset, why did you create a new relation osm.org/relation/9261405 named "Track relation for 180 Žilina – Košice"? What is it for? It seems unneeded, there is already a relation for the railway line at osm.org/relation/898943 . Also, route=tracks seems to serve the same purpose as route=railway so please do not add such relations.

Hi, die Eisenbahn Nr. 120 war schon gezeichnet (nur mit falschem Tag route=train statt route=railway). Beide deine neue Relationen sind unnoetige Duplikate. Und auch Falsch, da ist keine Zuglinie ref=120 (nur Eisenbahn)

route=railway was the correct tagging, route=train is completely different.

motor_vehicle=permissive does not solve the problem, it still means basically free for every vehicle. It does not mean "needs permission" (which I said is 'private'), but "owner gave permission to everyone for now". I'm reading the sign on the Mapillary image and it means access for bicycles allowed and for delivery vehicles. So I'll put that there. That could have allowed the Metro driver to go there.

Na danom mieste som naozaj nebol, preto sa na to pytam, ako to v skutocnosti je, kedze ste zadali protichodne udaje, dalsie su v rozpore s pravidlami OpensStreetMap a su nepouzitelne pre mapy a navigacie.

Martin: ano pozriem na to, zamerne klamlive udaje v OSM nepotrebujeme.

Hi, what standards does your fix meet now? You removed office= from the building so now the name of the building is 'alone' and there is no function to the building.

Zdravim, ked robite 3D budovy davajte pozor aby ste to robili spravne. building:part=true neexistuje, ma to byt building:part=yes.
Podobne cast restauracie Sapori osm.org/way/666509566 ste dali zaroven jednoposchodovu a zaroven dvojposchodovu. To asi logicky nejde.

Riesili sme to na fore, lebo ten expert pretagoval cele Slovensko, tak aby sme si dohodli system a vsetci o tom vedeli.
Asi nemame zakladne informacie, je dobre ak Vy ich mate, dufam, ze z legalneho zdroja. Ano asi si kazdy ide podla ineho zdroja, zial aj oficialne zdroje ako e-myto to ma oznacene podla nazvu R a D a nie podla znacky na ceste. Ideme teda podla SSC a fotiek Mapillary. Mozno keby ste na ten usek R2 dali note, ze je v skutocnosti znacena inak ako by podla navu R vyplyvalo, tak by si to niekto vsimol skor ako za 5 mesiacov. Zaujimave, ze na D3 a D4 ste to neopravili. Asi informacie ine su vsetko. Ak ich mate dobre, mozete teraz skontrolovat cele Slovensko, ci sme to urobili dobre.
II/526 by som neriesil, zrejme je to len "docasny" stav kym budu pokracovat R2 :) Pretagovat to na primary je subjektivny nazor, verim tomu, ze navigacia nepojde kvoli tomu namiesto R2 po I/16 lebo je to cez obec a je tam maxspeed=50.

Zdravim a aky zmysel malo odstranit znacku, ze je to namestie (place=square)? Skor by som pochyboval, ze je to park.

Zdravim, takze Banarka je spravny nazov oblasti?

Inak od toho pouzivatela Banarka asi bude treba revertovat alebo aspon opravit omnoho viac, vyzera ze si len potrebuje v OSM urobit poriadnu reklamu a premenoval si aj vsetky cesty. Uz som mu napisal v osm.org/changeset/64207120 .

Dobry den, tie cesty sa urcite nevolaju ako napr. "Cesta k Banarka - reštaurácia a penzión - asfalt" tak to prosim nepiste do nazvu (alebo dolozte zdroj, ze ich prislusny spravca cesty takto oznacil). Okrem toho tu napr. tvrdite, ze je asfaltova, ale v znacke povrchu (surface) je uvedene, ze strk (gravel).

Cely areal Banarky a vsetky objekty v nom su zakreslene vyrazne zle (napr. jedna restauracia je styrikrat).