Zdravim, preco zmena nazvu? Miestna cast "Miloslava" by mala existovat.

Zdravim, podla mna tie oblasti na zapad od Stupavy su skoro vsetko polia, preco myslite ze su to luky/pastviny?

Hi, why did you split the road at Parassapuszta, országhatár into one way for each direction? You claim to have used "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta", but such a split (a physical barrier between the roads) is not seen there. You have also broken all bus relations that operate through that road. So what is your real source of the data? Please always write the source into the changeset description or the 'source' tag on the changeset. The iD editor offers that.

Ano, mozeme pockat. Ak to viete odsledovat, tak super. Inak dovolil som si na tu kruhovu cestu pri Holiciach dat junction=roundabout, aby to bol kruhac. Inak by to na jednoprudovej obojsmernej ceste bolo zaujimave. Dufam, ze je to spravne.

So you haven't responded. I was at the street and it is a living street so the legal maxspeed is 20kph, not 30. Also it seemed to me the A and B addresses on some houses may be swapped compared to what you tagged. So I ask again what your real source is.

Ano, Ketelec/Bratislava-Juh ma zaujimal, tam ste maxspeed na R7 este nezadali. Tak super ked to doplnite. Neviete ci stihnu preznackovat aj R1/R2/R3 na dialnice?

Zdravim, podla coho sa ten kriz vola "Kamenny kriz"? Alebo je len z kamena?

Zdravim, dakujem za aktualizaciu R7.
Naozaj tu oznacili uz za dialnicu (motorway, nie trunk) ? Viem, ze podla novej vyhlasky od 1.4.2020 by to tak malo byt, ale ci uz su tak aj znacky. A nie na vsetky useky ste dali maxspeed=130. Je niekde nizsia rychlost?

Hi, please do not shift buildings with source=kapor2. Those are mostly placed correctly (with some exceptions) as they are imported from the cadastre database of Slovakia. So unless you have a much better GPS device than the state office, or a much better imagery, it is better when you align your imagery layer to them, not the other way round. Also Bing isn't very detailed and up to date at this place (we have much better images available in Slovakia). Also the iD editor does not look like suited for precision placement, as far as I have seen.

Hi, please try to use proper tags to describe types of objects, see osm.wiki/Main_Page . Stuffing everything into 'name' tags (even name:en in non-english speaking countries) is not very usable for applications and renderers.

Hi, please do not make up fictional names of objects and do not describe objects via the 'name' tag. The type of the object should be described using the appropriate tag, e.g. historic=wayside_cross, not name:en=wayside cross. Putting descriptions into names is useless and no application/map can use that.

Hi, please do not make up fictional attractions and fictional names. If there are peaks with elevations of 1071 and 1076 at the spots you marked, you create natural=peak+ele=1071 nodes. tourism=attraction + a description stuffed into name:en is not a proper way to do it. Also just because there is a local height maximum in the area, it does not mean it is an officially recognized peak. You rarely provide any sources for your data, so where did you get these peaks from?

Hi, please do not make up fictional names of the viewpoints. You can put such descriptive remark into 'note:en' or 'description' tag. But not into 'name' tag where only official names of the objects belong. Thanks

Zdravim, odkial pochadza nazov "Pramen starého tábořiště". To nevyzera byt ako oficialny nazov pramena na Slovensku. Prosim nevymyslajte si popisne nazvy, ktore neexistuju. Do znacky 'name' ma ist len vlastne meno objektu, ak na nom je nejake napisane, alebo je oficialne zname. Dakujem

Zdravim, preco ste ponicili kaplnky v Marianke a stupave? Preco ste poodstranovali amenity=place_of_worship a podoplnali nemyselne nazvy name=Kaplnka? Na Kalvarii pri kostole v Stupave ste preco odstranili religion?

Zdravim, preco ste zmenili kaplnky z building=chapel na building=yes? Samotne amenity=place_of_worship nestaci na urcenie toho, ako budova vyzera konstrukcne.

Zdravim, aky bol zmysel tejto zmeny? Preco ste odstranili nabozenstvo kaplniek (religion) a namiesto toho pridali zbytocny nazov "Kaplnka" ? NIkdy nesmiete pisat popois objektu do nazvu. Typ objektu ste mali vyjadrit pomocou building=chapel, alebo historic=wayside_shrine, alebo building=shrine, podla toho o aku stavbu ide (pozrite osm.wiki/Key:building).

Zdravim, prosim piste zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien ako "I was there", pozrite osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn . Ak ste boli na mieste, tato informacia patri ako znacky 'source=survey' na cetu sadu zmien. Vas editor iD to pri odosielani ponuka. Do popisu uvedte co ste urobili a preco. A prosim nepiste do znacky 'name' popis objektu, ako tu "Sennik". To patri do prislusnej znacky, ktora popisuje typ objektu, napriklad building. Do 'name' patria len vlastne mena objektov, ktore su na objekte napisane. Dakujem

Zdravim, ten uzemny plan Trnavy je nejaky verejny zdroj pouzitelny pre OSM? Viete poslat linku aj s licenciou, ktora to povoluje? A co konkretne ste z neho pouzili? Lebo ziadny konkretny objekt ste neoznacili ako source=uzemny plan. Naopak ste poposuvali budovy exportovane z katastra, ktore su vacsinou celkom OK, takze by ma zaujimalo ake presne GPS zariadenie mate, ze presnejsie ako kataster. Ale znacku source=kapor2 ste im nechali, aj ked uz teda z katastra nie su. A ten park Bela IV. je teda riadna improvizacia, polovica objektov oznackovana dost divne, povymyslane znacky ci plochy bez znaciek, ktore by oznacovali o aky objekt vlastne ide, len napr. surface.

osm.wiki/Key%3Alocation