aceman444's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
10871818 | over 5 years ago | Zdravim, aky objekt je 'cajkov' a preco sa nazyva 'kuriatka' ? |
48286026 | over 5 years ago | Hi, what is amenity=c on one of the buildings? |
11905570 | over 5 years ago | Zdravim, aky objekt ste tu chceli vyjadrit? Co je to 'ine' s nazvom 'Mojmirovce' ? |
69458542 | over 5 years ago | Hi, please do not make up tags when fullfiling maproulette tasks. There is no tag amenity=orphanage. But there exist tags for social_facility, see osm.wiki/Key:social_facility . |
64149287 | over 5 years ago | Zdravim, prosim piste tie stare nazvy do znacky 'old_name', nie do 'historic', tam patri byvaly typ objektu. Tiez prosim uvadzajte zdroj, lebo bing to urcite nie je. Dakujem. |
83916543 | over 5 years ago | Hi, what is landuse=woodland? Di you mean landuse=forest? |
46120207 | over 5 years ago | True, OSM is not cadastral map, but if we can use unique conscription numbers to check if we have all buildings, then why not (we do compare e.g. to official address registers). Why using the brain too much as you do, to split buildings at non-existent (made up) places and create duplicate numbers? So you did not need to fix anything, the buildings were correct and you just added damage splitting them as places where you just assume were borders of the buildings. No, you can't see the building edges on bing, you can't even always see them when standing before the building. And for "normal map use" (whatever it is), the user does not need to care if the building is split into several building=* parts, of those are buildings:part=* parts. |
69525589 | over 5 years ago | Super, dakujem |
60788617 | over 5 years ago | Super, dakujem. |
60788617 | over 5 years ago | Zdravim, naozaj su tie dve cesty v centre Vysneho Klatova jednosmerne (a smerom na sever)? Lebo na snimkach Mapillary o tom nevidim ziadnu dopravnu znacku. |
69525589 | over 5 years ago | Zdravim, tie fiktivne cesty ako osm.org/way/670308266 by nemali existovat. Ak chcete vyjadrit, ze po strane cesty je zastavka autobusu (vyklenok), pozrite znacku 'bus_bay'. |
81610037 | over 5 years ago | No maju tam stavat cely bytovy komplex Ovocne sady. Tak potom to nezabudnite preznacit, dakujem. |
81610037 | over 5 years ago | Zdravim, preco cesta na Ovocne sady len 'service'? Urcite to bude ulica, ked dostavaju domy. Ci potom to opravite? |
57931192 | over 5 years ago | Hallo, diese "Korrekturen" waren ganz sinnlos, Du hast die strassen unnoetig und falsch verschieben, die schon korrekt gelegen haben. Pass besser auf.
|
83092700 | over 5 years ago | Hi, when you added building=hotel, it would be useful to also add the hotel name and tourism=hotel to really tag it as a hotel. Unless it was just a building built as a hotel but no longer used as a hotel. Then your change would be correct. Thanks. |
81623806 | over 5 years ago | Hi, the Bauhaus building does not have
|
64205574 | over 5 years ago | Zaujimave, dakujem. |
64205574 | over 5 years ago | Zdravim, odkial pochadzka nazov "filialne nadrazie"? Taka ulica sa na https://bratislava.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Dokumenty/Str%C3%A1nky/Zoznam_komunikacii_v_Bratislave_februar_2020.pdf nenachaza. |
84129333 | over 5 years ago | Suhlasim s popisom. A hlavne by to malo byt railway=razed, ak uz tam po zeleznici nie je ani stopy. Tento pouzivatel zahadzal Slovensko uz neexistujucimi trasami a railway=abandoned, co znamena ze este nejake stopy po nich su. A to nie je pravda. Treba to poopravivat. Napisal som mu. |
83875916 | over 5 years ago | Also, it is not very useful to add non-existent objects into OSM and is against the rules. But if you really need the old railways for anything, then at least use the right tags to not mislead people they will find any railway remnants at spots you added. |