OpenStreetMap 로고 OpenStreetMap

Today's Spam

alexkemp님이 English로 2016년 9월 7일에 게시함. 최근 2016년 9월 8일에 업데이트됨.

I cannot find the IRC details to report these any other way, so here are links to recent spam:

  1. Jabong.c0m Coupon codes, Deals & Cashback… (removed)
  2. การกิน ทำให้คุณดูอ่อนกว่าวัย
    Translation: Earlier today, I’ll get it. To eat some food and make you look younger tender… (removed)

(many thanks to those that removed them)

coda:

I finally found the email from SomeoneElse buried under a hundred others giving direction to report spammers in the #osm-dev IRC channel on OTRS - see OSM wiki help. Maybe next time.

이메일 아이콘 Bluesky 아이콘 Facebook 아이콘 LinkedIn 아이콘 마스토돈 아이콘 텔레그램 아이콘 X 아이콘

토론

2016년 9월 7일 08:37Vincent de Phily님의 의견

Probably better to edit osm.wiki/Spam

2016년 9월 7일 14:04alexkemp님의 의견

Hi @Vincent de Phily

Well, no disrespect, my friend, but that link seems a complete waste of time. The oldest entry when I look at it is a user since 10 February, 2015; zero traces, zero map entries. I x diary entry to get a link to his Profile, which contains a link to his site. Spam, lovely Spam, yet zero action for 18 months.

Meanwhile, this public entry has seen both users removed in less than 24 hours. That’s more like it.

2016년 9월 7일 15:29Vincent de Phily님의 의견

Checking the wiki spam page history, the last batch of spam cleanup was in march. Not great indeed, I thought it was more frequent than this.

It may be effective, but I don’t think that diaries are the right medium for spam warnings : people reading them are looking for news about OSM, not routine admin stuff.

Hopefully https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/841 and its associated PR will be solved/merged soon, so that we finally have a decent reporting system.

2016년 9월 7일 18:47alexkemp님의 의견

@Vincent de Phily:

I don’t think that diaries are the right medium for spam warnings : people reading them are looking for news about OSM, not routine admin stuff.

I agree fully. However, if there are zero other effective methods to achieve the desired result, practical folks will take the route that works. I see a lot of crying for the moon; Engineers like practicality. For me, Effective wins every time. This particular mini-story is a perfect exemplar for the way in which OSM gets attenuated (‘made thin’) & deprived of air. I think that perhaps the story of Alexander & the Gordian knot has application here, although I’m deeply pessimistic as to any actual solution.

2016년 9월 8일 09:29alexkemp님의 의견

Me, last comment:

if there are zero other effective methods to achieve the desired result, practical folks will take the route that works

Here is an illustration of the attitude of mind that I’m talking about (it’s not pretty, but it works):

what works

댓글을 남기려면 로그인하세요