You have provided nothing except proof of your gaslighting abilities. You're unable to stick to the actual technical facts, but instead you turn to ad hominem and a narcissistic tirade about your greatness and unvaluable contributions. You know who else had such a wonderful personality? Another sorein, banned for 99 years. Wonder what he did, oh, but I guess you know ;) So, please, stick to the technical facts or go back to Tiktok, where I'm sure you'll find like-minded people.

You don't seem to understand the question. I asked what's the source, meaning how do you know the exact shape and location? Do you have an old map which you overlaid? Did you went on the ground and did GPS measures? Because sure as hell this thing is not visible on aerial imagery, except maybe "pieces of", which don't justify the having the full feature on the map.

Which leads us to the actual problem: you like to draw things that are not there anymore. You draw non-existing rails through corn fields, through industrial areas, even through shopping malls.

I distinctly remember when I last reported your changes, the DWG's conclusion was exactly the same: IF IT'S A HISTORICAL FEATURE AND _NO_ TRACE OF IT IS PRESENT ON THE GROUND ANYMORE, IT DOESN'T BELONG ON THE MAP. Not even on OpenRailwayMap.

And you have the audacity to threathen to report me for my "violations". The guy that periodically gets banned and comes back with alternative accounts. So sure, report me.

Dacă tot desenezi case, apasă și un "Q" pe ele ca să aibă unghiuri drepte și să nu mai fie nevoie să vină cineva după tine ca să le îndrepte.

name=circuit subteran salina nu e corect; folosește description pentru genul ăsta de chestii.

Nu se pune `brand=Turism` pt ca "Turism" nu e un brand. Corect ar fi, de ex. "brand=Hilton"

Ce-i cu punctul ăsta în mijlocul giratoriului? osm.org/node/11059580232/history

Nu se folosește `roundabout=yes`, ci `junction=roundabout` .

Vezi că ai pus layer=-1 pe unele footways create, dar nu doar pe porțiunea care trece prin clădire, ci pe toată lungimea lor, ceea ce nu e corect. De ex, osm.org/way/1293741775 sau osm.org/way/1293741785

De ce ai șters nodul 275223729 osm.org/node/275223729 ? Acolo sunt 2 stații de autobuz cu numele "Manolache"

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=44.451718%7E26.102312&lvl=20.7&pi=-17.2&style=x&dir=173.9

I don't think you remember the telegram talk fully; we then explained to you that address numbers in Romania don't get assigned _only_ to buildings, but, in fact, they get assigned to the land plot underneath a building by an authority ( https://www.ancpi.ro/ ) . And most of the times, the address numbers are physically placed on the fence of the land plot, where the gate to the property is...that's why you see all those rows of numbers .

So, does this answer your question?

De ce ai pus access=no pe Tiberiu Olah? osm.org/way/1010764380 Ăla se folosește atunci când există un semn de interzicere al accesului, e cazul aici?

Please use a more descriptive changeset message than ".", which means nothing to nobody.

Also, please check the naming guidelines in OSM: osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

"Cladire Ritech" (actually, Clădire, because diacritics should be used) is probably incorrect, unless it's the official name of the building, i.e. it appears in official papers like "Cladire Ritech".

You can use the `description` tag if you really want to put this information.

The more correct way to do things would be to add a POI for Ritech inside the building.

vezi că exista deja un punct pentru numărul 44, dacă l-ai pus și pe clădire l-ai duplicat.

Salut. Ai putea să îmbunătățești un pic stația asta de autobuz, te rog? De obicei se mapează prin punct, nu prin poligoane neregulate, numele nu e cu majuscule decât în anumite cazuri (vezi site STB) iar la locația respectivă stația este Metalurgiei, nu Drumul Binelui.

why did you remove the building tag on https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/315524791 and related parts of the cathedral?

Can you please stop the useless changeset descriptions, especially this sort of mockery/profanity?

The description is useful for the community to understand your changes and >90% of your descriptions are useless.

Salut,

Văd c-ai adăugat aici trotuar separat; pentru ăsta trebuie adăugat și pe drumul de care depinde `sidewalk:left=separate` sau `sidewalk:right=separate` , in funcție de partea pe care se află.

Deasemenea, văd că o parte din ce-ai adăugat e trecută ca highway=path, aia nu e tot sidewalk?

I guess you're mixing OpenRailwayMap with OpenHistoricalMap.

In the present day there's no trace on the ground of the railways that you've mapped, so they don't need to be here. But OpenHistoricalMap will gladly accept them.

Salut! Corect e să ai o singură chestie la addr:city, e.g. "Chiajna", nu "Roșu, Chiajna, Ilfov". Și nici nu-i neapărat de menționat, fiindcă obiectul se află în interioriul graniței administrative Chiajna, deci s-ar putea deduce automat.