As I said on talk-ie, I have finally made an import of the Logainm data. I used the import account rorym_import_logainm. I imported it in 2 goes. First just the baronies (which was only 6 missing), to test that the import worked. That was changeset 37805913. Then I imported the rest, in 3 changesets 37807910, 37807270 and 37806626
All in, I updated 20,506 objects. About 56% of civil parishes were able to be matched up, and 39% of townlands. The main reason for the low number is due to how the script matches up. For CPs, it looks at the barony it’s in, and checks the logainm id of that, and then looks for an exact name match. If the barony has not been mapped, then it can’t match up. Likewise, for townlands, it looks at the CP. No CP mapped and the townland can’t be matched up. There is a lot of areas where only townlands are mapped. If you want to improve Logainm importing, please add more baronies and civil parishes.
There were many cases where an exact name match wasn’t found. I haven’t looked into this yet, but I suspect it might be just misspellings, or things like that.
It takes a long time to upload 20,000 objects with JOSM. :)
I plan to continue to work on this, improve the script, and re-run imports as more OSM data is added. You can follow it on the user diary for the import account.
討論
由 jianglaihong 於 2016年03月15日 09時58分 發表的評論
010-7793-2717
由 Stereo 於 2016年03月15日 15時57分 發表的評論
At the hack weekend, Dietmar and I played with similarity() in pg_trgrm. An interesting analysis would be, for the townlands with no match, to show the unmatched townlands on the other side with the most similar names. When’s the next hackwochenende? :)
由 Stereo 於 2016年03月15日 15時59分 發表的評論
Also, that analysis could be restricted by barony and CP.