Ja, nogen systemer viser faktisk en bule i stedet for en spids.

Tja, det kan siges, og man skal heller ikke tagge for en bestemt renderer, men der er faktisk en del, som skelner. Mht. hill: osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dhill Og det er også rigtigt, at f.eks. potlatch kun har peak i menuen, så de vil blive ved at komme ind.

Ja, jeg sad jo på båden og oprettede.

Vi kuune ike finde dieselstanderen, men hurra, her var den, så på kortet så snart der var brændstof på båden, Systemet foreslog selv tag...

Certainly. I actually asked the community for help as those consequences were totally inadvertent. Thank you very very much.

Ref https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/86971/inadvertent-change-to-relations-need-help

Needs some cleaning, thank you. Almost: Horsnæs Station and Zackenberg Base are identical. Then one specific building is called Zackenberg. I also note that a b uilding todayt only has a number. Typo.

Brønlunhus is not here. According to Nunat Aqqi it is some km to the northwest. I have pinpointed an approximate position (so there are currently TWO Brønlundhus), but cannot identify it in ID-editor with Maxar Premium as background. Strange, because I can see a lot of other houses and cabins, so some further aerial photo seach is needed....

Mitterspids: Possibly so. For some other areas I have been in contact with people who rented a helicopter to get at described observation points to get specific peaks sorted out: ref https://www.landesmuseum.ch/en/exhibitions/temporary/2020/greenland-1912/greenland-1912

Negative. I asked and got a permission. However I had to do a lot of pre-processing, because for example peak heights are an the descriptive texts. Also the coordinates were pretty inaccurate. Staunings Alper in particular has a lot of peaks that have to be fine adjusted. All data - rivers, bays, glaciers etc. were points. So basically the data I got was (part of) the same as they use/will be using for making official maps....

Btw. I also moved the points to be spot on the paks and not just the mountains. Will now fit for example https://www.peakfinder.org/?lat=72.02000&lng=-25.07000&ele=2400&azi=121.18&alt=-2.46&fov=45&cfg=s&name=Dreikant

You are right. MY source: https://data.geus.dk/geusmap/?mapname=stednavnedb#baslay=&optlay=&extent=351891.59438181866,7992276.520692799,364306.6992680654,7997602.473447807&layers=grl_geus_north_east_higgins_map,grl_ne_placenames&filter_1=txt_search.part%3D%26placename%3D

Så det er mig, der skal have nyt leverpostej i brillerne.....

Nå, den er da ellers afmærket med rød stiplet linje og "Sindalstien 10 km"..

I øvrigt mener jeg, at bollard pr. default blokerer korrekt (for biler) ref osm.wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

Jeg har lige været der nede for at se efter hvordan det er..

Så møj manne tak. Har ikke været bevidst om, at dette tag var sat, og slet ikke om dets implikationer...

Det sår faktisk allerøverst i osm.wiki/Relation:route

Og hvis du tjekker f.eks. Bøjden- Fynshav, så er der heller nogen 'vej'. Har i øvrigt åbnet en diskussion på OSM forum, og der er nogen, der foreslår bare at lave en streg...

Det er lige det, og ved nærlæsning kan man godt lave en route, der ikke er på vej eller sti. Den skal bare tagges korrekt med type og formål. Tjekkede lige en færgerute, for det er jo ganske tilsv.. Så nu består Hjertesti Grishøjgårds Krat Nord af to stykker: En stump grussti og så delen, der bare er i landskabet....

Spørgsmålet er så, om man skal tegne et fodspor, der ikke er der, eller undlade at vise en officiel hjertesti blot fordi der på en del af strækningen ikke er noget slidt spor. Pest eller kolera?

Yep, this marked route goes over the unbeaten track. Not unusual for our Nature Agency/Ministry of Environment. If enough follow the signs it may end up with a visible track.