OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Pakistan mapping and canals, oh my!

Posted by andygates on 19 August 2010 in English.

Working from the limited high-res Yahoo imagery and the excellent Perry-Castaneda mosaic put up yesterday by Jean-Guilhem, I've been ticking through bare bits of Pakistan map adding what look like the most important features (settlement names, metalled roads, railway lines, major waterways). There's a *lot* to do, because there's a lot of unmapped territory.

I hear that some post-flood imagery is coming online soon and it'll be good to go over that and tag broken bridges, destroyed road sections and refugee camps. For reference, the special tags that developed out of the Haiti response are here: osm.wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Tags/Humanitarian_Data_Background -- here's where you'll find bridge=collapsed et al.

One thing I've noticed is that some other mappers are laying roads where black straight things are... but follow the photos along for a while and they turn out to be canals (most roads are dusty). Caveat cartographer! Double-caveat when you have roads running *alongside* canals, which is also very common.

Interesting to note that the current waterway tagging schema is implicitly drainage-biased (it's all the soggy British and Dutch in the project!); I'm using waterway=canal and waterway=ditch for major and minor irrigation channels, but I wonder if that's ideal?

Location: Higher Wear, Countess Wear, Topsham, Exeter, Devon, Devon and Torbay, England, EX2 6DG, United Kingdom
Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

Comment from lyx on 19 August 2010 at 14:15

I have so far tagged all irrigation canals as waterway=canal, and for the small ones I tried to estimate the canal width from the aerial images and added a width=whatever tag. Might have forgotten that for a few canals though, so if you notice some unreasonably wide canals where there should be only small ones around Multan, feel free to fix them.

Log in to leave a comment