Hello, this was a mistake. Thank you for pointing it out.

This is a smoking bar, according to a sign outside.

This ATM node is inside a building under construction, it should probably be somewhere else osm.org/node/12694749375

Hi, I didn't find any signs with entrance numbers (Ulaz 1-4), only with addresses (19-19v). Do you mind if I remove it (name and int_name)?

Hi, there are no strict rules about foreign names in local community (they didn't discuss Russian, but an idea of using name:en was denied), but usually the don't add it and consider it meaningless. You may start a discussion on a forum if you want:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/rs

In my opinion, the translation doesn't make sense at all due to the similarity between Serbian and Russian.

Hi, please don't add "улица" to "name:ru" for a streets where tag "name" doesn't contain "улица"

I removed tag "access=no" because this way is walkable now

Please don't remove addressees from the OSM. I spent my own time to research it.
Example:
osm.org/node/12196980136/history

I may try to fix it. Do you know any way to quickly check the result?

I didn't realize that the original idea was to keep such addresses so I will focus on other activities. Thanks for letting me know.

Hi, I usually only delete addresses with removed:ref:RS:kucni_broj where there are no visible buildings (it means they were demolished years ago or never even existed). Do you think this is wrong?

You may be right, this address exists in the cadaster but point is a bit behind a building:
44.808609, 20.479853
If you have seen the sign on the building it means the location in the cadaster is wrong.

Nicely done.
But this small building probably shouldn't have "inner triangles" and can be simplified to only 4 angles
osm.org/way/1279179787

Hi, did you find any signs with number 80? I tried to do the same a few weeks ago and found only 78

Hi, it's working now.

Hi!
There is also some ongoing work for this bug and hopefully it will be fixed soon.

Thank you. At first it looked like a random number :)

How did you calculate the height?

Why did you removed the buildings with addresses? Addresses were filled from the cadaster.
Also the new buildings are not reflect the actual rectangle shapes.

Please change addr:place to addr:street