Odd that key:place cannot be used with lines, since the definition on the wiki page includes this: "Defines the center or outline of a named place". An outline is a line.

Ah, the errant node has been corrected. That was a mistake.

I have double-checked the nodes for the villages in this changeset; none of the nodes includes the boundary=* key. That key has been applied only to the linear boundaries encircling the villages. If Nominatim has a problem with linear boundaries that is fodder for a pull request.

Please read osm.wiki/Boundaries, which includes this statement:

"area The original accepted usage was to only apply this tag to areas.

relation+way However there now seems to be a consensus of using the boundary key also on linear ways, with relations used to aggregate these ways if needed."

Boundaries are by definition not areas, they are linear and can be demarcated by points (nodes). See the Merriam-Webster definition here: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/boundary, which includes this text as an example:

"The river forms the country's western boundary." In short, defining a boundary=administrative as a line is perfectly normal and appears to be acceptable to the OSM community as well as in accord with the generally understood definition of the term "boundary".

This terminal is NOT for use by diplomats or Turkmen officials other than the president and members of his family. It should not be labeled as you labeled it.

The motorway project west of the P-1 highway is the Ashgabat-Turkmenbashy Motorway, started and then abandoned by Polimeks due to non-payment. Recent imagery shows no progress since it was abandoned.

Way: 919256944 has attached to it several untagged points. This is unusual to say the least. Can you please explain what you are drawing on the map at this place? osm.org/way/919256944

Why did you add the string "state water transport department regional office = boat jetty ,ernakulam" to the name of this monument?

I suggest you use Maxar imagery instead of Bing, since it is fresher. Bing imagery dates to 2014 and is often out of date.

Under construction. If you web-search "TAPI" and "Turkmenistan" you can find articles about it. It was supposed to be finished in 2019 but of course it is taking longer :-)

Hi, Mateusz, there is a pipeline connection here. I marked this to make it easier to map the pipeline when it is constructed. Supposedly the pipe has been procured and laid but not welded together yet.

I have located Pagtaçylyk elsewhere based on field observation during a visit to Dashoguz Region (see my Mapillary imagery). What are the other possibilities for the name of this village?

Don't use Bing imagery in Turkmenistan, please. It is at least seven years out of date. Use Maxar and also ground-level imagery I collected using Mapillary, please. I have redrawn the Nohur road back to where it really is based on the latest imagery. Please also read osm.wiki/Turkmenistan if you want to help map Turkmenistan. Thank you for your interest!

I'm going to change it to a neighborhood since it was annexed by the city of Turkmenabat in July 2016 and is now inside the city limits (which I have finally finished drawing). It may have been a village before being annexed.

Thank you for contributing to the map of Turkmenistan. The name Azatlyk is unattested in this part of Lebap etraby. What is the source of your information that this village is named Azatlyk? Please check against osm.wiki/Districts_in_Turkmenistan.

Preliminary does not mean permanent.

Please read the guidance in the wiki.

osm.wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
"The extent of the area should mark the boundary of known residential use, not the extent of the whole town or village."

Thank you for your edits, but there is no need to add residential areas to entire towns and villages that have been demarcated with administrative boundaries. I will delete these duplicates when I encounter them.

Дом культуры в Фарапе уже отмечен. Удаляю точку.