Can you provide the changset URL for your correction?

Which directionality is changed is not clear. Do not ignore crossing ways
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138466266

Please do not ignore the crossing ways warning where building is crossing highway.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138602080

This looks ok, if you have first hand knowledge of the location. As the poi is already existing as node cochin cement limited (8397094681), that needs to be deleted. Also as it is a factory, it would be useful if you can map the driveway road to it.

The tag wetland=marsh does not seem be suitable , based on Bing imagery. Unless you have first hand knowledge of the location, it may be better to map as natural=water and water=pond.

The way osm.org/way/1190085899 is not clearly visible from the imagery specified. If you are using local knowledge or GPS trace information can you add that as source.

Naming suffixes in parenthesis may not be required unless there are places with same name in neighboring districts Check this as an example: osm.org/node/11049429079

We are not using District suffix for the districts in Andhra Pradesh for example. it is similar to how a country's boundary is named. For print rendering the names need to be short as well. You may reconsider your edits in light of the above

Welcome to OSM. A suggestion to use title case for names as suggested in osm.wiki/Names#Uppercase_characters

Deviation can be computed from the geometry, so this is not needed to be stored as a tag- value.

fixed through osm.org/changeset/138537212

vandalism fixed through osm.org/changeset/138535992

More easy to understand explanation https://twitter.com/KETRACO1/status/1122772671266209792

I found this by googling https://cea.nic.in/wp-content/uploads/notification/2021/04/Draft%20_Standard_Technical_Specification_for_Steel_Pole_strcutrues.pdf (page 13)

The ways you deleted are visible on Bing imagery. So it is better to change the tag to unclassified for that segment, if you do not find houses nearby.

The building is not clearly visible in Bing. It can be made into a proper rectangle.

The name needs to be updated as Tech Zone, as per the guidance at osm.wiki/Names

Thanks for requesting review. I have reviewed your edits. I think it may not be easy to get barrier information from imagery. Unless you have direct local knowledge of the area, it may be better to omit barrier tagging.

You are continuing to map APSRTC Bus stand neighborhoods, despite my earlier feedback not to name the service roads. You are also using name with all capital letters, which is not the guidelines. As you have not responded to my earlier messages, I do not have any other option but to report to DWG.

Service roads do not need a name. Please note