aweech's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
92729602 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
|
92625488 | almost 5 years ago | I'm guessing you're the same person that was banned for vandalism here, but maybe you're not. In any case, please stop vandalism. OpenStreetMap is not your personal toy to wreck as you please. |
92595976 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
92443506 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
92306809 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
92290170 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, what did you mean by placing a minor/unclassified road in Jaffrey? I couldn't find anything through aerial imagery, is it new construction? |
92284382 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
89588176 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, I'm a bit confused by your comment. There aren't any trails connecting to this driveway right now. And I tagged this driveway as a private driveway. User Stan - PB Trails had tagged it as an inaccessible driveway with a name that violates OSM's naming guidelines. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate and osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions for more information. |
91536369 | almost 5 years ago | Also that page you linked to has a giant red warning saying to go through the import process. Can you link to the talk-us or imports list discussion required by the process? I searched the archives of both lists and couldn't find anything. |
91536369 | almost 5 years ago | The data that you uploaded is very low-quality in many places. Are you planning on going through and fixing it up? |
91157982 | almost 5 years ago | I drew a backcountry camping area for as far up the road as I could see disturbances that could be camping spots. If you think the camping area extends further up the road, we can improve it. osm.org/relation/11674700 |
91536369 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
91529927 | almost 5 years ago | I went ahead and reverted this since I drove parts of this today and I know that that part was incorrect. You didn't respond to my query yesterday about your source? It very well may be that the length south of the I-293/93 intersection has changed speed limits, but I seriously doubt your source at this point. Can you help me understand where you're coming from? |
91468009 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
91182699 | almost 5 years ago | Yeah, the TIGER tags are generally considered noise since all of the information, save zip code lines, are already present in the other tags (tiger:cfcc -> highway, tiger:county -> the enclosing admin area, tiger:name_base -> name, tiger:name_direction_prefix -> name, tiger:name_direction_suffix -> name). And a bot went through years ago to delete most of the zip code info anyways. Some editors have it set so some TIGER tags are automatically deleted when the way is touched (both JOSM and iD do this). I've decided that I'll be removing the redundant TIGER tags as I go, and a lot of other mappers have as well. |
91164944 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, I see that in this edit you abbreviated the street names here. In OpenStreetMap, it is preferred to expand most abbreviations in the `name` tag. Please see osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 for more information. I went ahead and fixed these names. |
91157982 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
90931114 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks for double checking this! |
90797849 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks for removing the ele tags. But what are the name tags? They seem nonsensical and technical. I get that this is a resort-like area, but "Block Reference [9316]:0" is such a weird name for a building. Checking out the website, most of the buildings have lot names like "Lot #6-TC" (and that probably doesn't fall under the scope of the `name` tag). |
90809114 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|