aweech's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
94465879 | over 4 years ago | Hello,
|
93505774 | almost 5 years ago | Thank you for your response,
I'll go ahead and revert those two changesets where you deleted the ways, and then you can add the access tags and move the nodes as you see fit according to your local knowledge. Also, keep in mind the difference between permissive access and private access. Permissive means people can use the paths, but the landowner could close them at any time or ban individuals. Private means anyone who wants to use the paths needs landowner permission, and in New Hampshire there must be No Trespassing signs at the entrance to the path. Happy mapping! |
93507954 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
93505774 | almost 5 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap, I am confused by your edits here. There are trails visible on aerial imagery and GPS traces, but then you deleted and moved them away. What did you mean by this? Were the trails moved and destroyed in the last few months? |
93447912 | almost 5 years ago | I opened a bug report in iD since you say that it wasn't intentional. Regarding when to use Power Station Grounds vs. Coal-Fired Power Plant, only use the Power Station Grounds when you do not know any of the sources the plant uses. It does not matter that the plant may be retrofitted in the future, only what it burns today. If a plant does burn other kinds of fuel alongside coal, then you can add those other fuels to the plant:source tag, as explained in the Wiki. In OpenStreetMap, the most specific tagging is the most correct, not the most general. Merrimack Station and many of the other power plants you edited recently only burn coal. |
93498020 | almost 5 years ago | Driveways are mapped in OpenStreetMap. It is correctly tagged as a driveway. Please see for more information osm.wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway |
93498064 | almost 5 years ago | Hello,
|
93498020 | almost 5 years ago | Hello,
|
93487289 | almost 5 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap,
|
93447912 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
93343213 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
93303244 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I went ahead and restored the tags you deleted. |
93262599 | almost 5 years ago | I wish they would update Bing here, but I'm glad we get some high resolution imagery, even if it's almost 10 years old. In most of the area around here, Esri is newest. |
93262599 | almost 5 years ago | Just an FYI, I removed these crossings because they were removed in the big construction project a few years ago (the Bing imagery is from like 2011 and is way out of date). Thank you for your contributions in Concord! |
93258471 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
93161451 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
Also you added surface=paved to many nodes. You might be interested in the iD editor. It is accessed by pressing the Edit button on osm.org, and it is harder to make mistakes like that using it. Happy Mapping! |
93034630 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
Please see osm.wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater and related pages for more information on mapping water features. |
92851499 | almost 5 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
|
92820625 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|
92816709 | almost 5 years ago | Hi,
|