Hi,
In this edit, you tagged a business on Nine Mile Canyon Road with a house number of 9 and a street name of Mile Canyon Road. Also, the business was already mapped. I removed the duplicate and bad information that you added.

Hi,
In this edit you replaced the Brigham City Family Fun Center with Takumi Japanese Grill, but in a comment on osm.org/changeset/105629299, local mapper Level said that the bowling alley is still open. Do you know where the Japanese restaurant should really go? Do they share a building?

Thanks for catching that; I was just cleaning up after changeset 105579228 which deleted the bowling alley but forgot to remove the sport tag. Do you know where the Japanese restaurant goes? I'll comment on 105579228 too to ask the person who originally deleted the bowling alley.

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edits, as you requested, and I think that they are good. I went ahead and updated some of the other buildings in this neighborhood to include changes since it was first mapped in 2013.

Hi,
A rest area is much larger than a single building. It was just fine as a node. Same for the Echo Canyon rest area. Please see osm.wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area for more information on mapping rest areas.

Hi,
I reviewed this edit, as you requested, and I think it's just fine. I did touch up the course of the brook and add GNIS info while I was checking it. The stream showed up perfectly clear in both the new Esri and old Esri imagery layers. I've noticed that you've been leaning a lot on USGS topos while adding streams, and those tend to be pretty out of date (or never accurate to begin with). The Esri clarity layer is mostly leaves-off which makes it easier to spot streams.

Anyways, thank you for this contribution, and happy mapping!

Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contribution! I reviewed your edit as you requested. I gave the residence a proper address so search works as it should. Do you happen to know if all the streets in this new development are finished? Or which ones are? I can add the ones that have been constructed to the map, but I don't know how far along construction has progressed.

Please read osm.wiki/Key:maxspeed#Driving_direction for how to tag speed limits that are different in each direction. I've been mapping the speed limit signs to help you out in these cases, but you don't seem to be getting it. And, of course, please read osm.wiki/Key:surface#Values once again. And, since I found at least one street that you tagged with access=private that didn't have any sign saying such, please read osm.wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate.

Hi,
Do you have any idea how old these tracks are? Most of them have fully-grown trees in them and look to be unused for 30+ years. We really shouldn't be adding features to OSM that don't exist in real life.

Hi,
The place is a school. Did you mean to place the hotel somewhere else? And do you have an English name for it?

Привет,
Место - школа. Вы хотели разместить отель в другом месте? И есть ли у вас английское название?

Hi,
A few things about this edit. Firstly you forgot to expand the abbreviation of Magnolia Lane. And secondly, it would have been helpful to cite a source since you are a remote mapper working as part of a team, and it was only recently that Prospect Avenue was renamed. It took some hunting to verify that it had in fact changed to Magnolia Lane. Even if the source is something opaque like internal Mapbox data, it helps folks working to fix errors understand where the info is coming from.

Anyways, thank you for your contribution in Exeter!

The Southern Parkway was opened to motor vehicles last week, though it has been open to other users for a while https://www.stgeorgeutah.com/news/archive/2021/05/20/mgk-todays-a-great-day-officials-celebrate-completion-of-southern-parkway. You would have noticed that if you had checked the history on the way.

An empty lane is not enough of a barrier to divide a highway. Please see osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways for more information. I did ask around and several others agreed that this is not enough of a barrier to warrant splitting the way in OSM, plus it's what's documented in the Wiki. And SR-9 can be divided in OSM when the construction project actually happens. The info in OSM shouldn't be purposefully wrong for years just because of a future project.

And you wouldn't have to fix all of the lane and access info that you deleted if you hadn't had deleted them in the first place. I did notice that woodpeck had told you before that that style of mapping is not great for many reasons.

While you may have had good intentions, you have yet to explain why you split SR-9 into two ways despite it being undivided, why you deleted the destination and lane info at the I-15 junction, why you deleted access tags at the I-15 junction, why you changed the speed limit between 5300 West and the bridge over the river, why you deleted turning lane info along the route, why you marked the junction with the Southern Parkway as under construction, and why you wanted to delete all of the history on every way along this route. You may have spent hours working on it, but so did the mappers who worked to add all of the information you tried to delete. The only source you cited was Maxar imagery, but none of those changes appeared in that source. For more information, please see osm.wiki/Good_practice.

Normally I'd wait for a response before reverting a changeset that may have had good intentions, but basically everything you've done in Utah over the last few months has been undone by local mappers, and you've been mostly ignoring the complaints about your edits across the country, so I decided to take quick action here.

Hi,
There are many things wrong with this edit. Firstly, you removed vital tags like destinations, lanes, and refs. Secondly, you split a highway that is not divided on the ground. Thirdly, you removed several entire exits. Now, it could be that some of these changes have really occurred, but you have a terrible track record at this point, so I'm reverting this, your other changesets here tonight, and contacting the DWG.

Hi,
A couple of things about your edits this week. These very much look like vandalism. We expect that contributors improve the quality of OpenStreetMap, and drawing non-existent roads is not good. I will be reverting each of the 4 changesets you made this week. There may be some good changes in some of them, but it's impossible to separate the wheat from the chaff when you also do things like draw random motorways in the desert. If you would like to start honestly contributing to OpenStreetMap, I would recommend reading osm.wiki/Good_practice to see what is expected.

Hi,
I'm confused by this changeset. Glen Bench Road is several miles to the north and west. Also, I couldn't find any info about the wangudfalamapa campaign on the Wiki. What is going on here?

Hi,
Thank you for responding and explaining the situation. In general, things that don't exist yet shouldn't be in OSM and ought to be added as they are built. However, if you really want to tag the future routing, you can use highway=proposed + proposed=path. There isn't an editor preset for that (because the recommended course of action is to add things when they open), so you'd have to add the tags manually at the bottom of the toolbar on the left-hand side. If you know when the section is planned to be opened, you could also add the construction_end_expected=YYYY-MM-DD tag with an estimated date. In summary, portions of the Greenway that aren't developed yet should be tagged as either highway=proposed + proposed=path or just as an abandoned railway.

As for connecting the different segments into a kind of route, that is just what route relations are for. In the editor, you can select a way and hit the big plus button at the bottom of the left-hand toolbar in the relation section, then type in "new relation", and then a new preset selection will pop up to create a route relation. You could create a cycle route, walking route, or both. The route relation would have the name "Baboosic Greenway", and the individual segments can have their own name if they have one, or just be called "Baboosic Greenway" as well. You can take a look at the Concord-Lake Sunapee Rail Trail which is in a similar situation: osm.org/relation/7300836. Doing it that way helps it show up nicely on renderers like Waymarked Trails (https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=12!43.2463!-71.6901).

As for marking missing bridges, you could tag the crossing as a ford. Or you could just leave a hole in the path. That approach will keep routers from suggesting that segment as a through-way, and it's a very good model of a missing bridge.

Please feel free to continue this thread if you have more questions or need help getting started :)

Hi,
Barnard Hill Road is a Class VI road in the town of Weare. From what I could find, Weare places no restrictions on motor vehicle access on Class VI roads besides in mud season, so motor_vehicle=agricultural is incorrect. There's also a sign at the north end visible in Bing street-level imagery that says that it is open to all vehicles at their own risk. You might be interested in width, surface, and smoothness tags to describe the accessibility of the roadway to motor vehicles.

Hi,
Mary Hadley Road and Melvin Valley Road are Class VI roads in the town of Weare. From what I could find, Weare places no restrictions on motor vehicle access on Class VI roads besides in mud season, so motor_vehicle=no is incorrect. Also there's a house on Mary Hadley Road. You might be interested in width, surface, and smoothness tags to describe the accessibility of the roadways to motor vehicles.

Hi,
I'm reviewing your changeset, as you requested, and I have some questions. It looks like a lot of the trail that you added hasn't been used yet, and the only reference to it that I can find is in the April 13th minutes of the Amherst Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee. I found a bunch of references to the B&M Trail, and the sum of them all made it seem like it wasn't developed except for a stretch between Walnut Hill Road and Dream Lake. I did see that the stretch north of Baboosic Lake is in the NHDOT's 10-year plan. So, was it built this winter then? Is all of this trail just super new? Or is it yet to be built? Also, did they build a bridge over the Baboosic Brook, or did they put the brook in a culvert?