barefootstache's Comments

Changeset	Kada	Komentar
151974953	prije više od 1 godine	Will start using the BDOrtho IGN imagery and fix the alignment issues again...
151974953	prije više od 1 godine	Hey divaddivag, the alignment was only done 10m circumference off the node: osm.org/node/11941542944 and since the path (osm.org/way/958256696#map=14/49.3891/-0.9387) was moved ever so slightly on the eastern side, the changeset looks bigger than it should be. Will hike it the next couple of days to get a better GPX reading and we can conclude after that if a reversion is needed.
139943462	prije otprilike 2 godine	okay good to know, I knew there was some way to do it without the relation
139943462	prije otprilike 2 godine	osm.org/relation/16213234
139943462	prije otprilike 2 godine	Thanks for catching that, was hoping that building:part=yes would suffice, though seems like I still needed to create a relation and add a parent. It should be fixed now.
126717253	prije otprilike 2 godine	Danke, habe wohl vergessen zu überprüfen ob es schon existiert
137215038	prije otprilike 2 godine	Danke, mir ist später aufgefallen, dass ich das falsche Tag benutzt habe, aber bin noch nicht dazugekommen alle Instanzen up zu daten.
127177349	prije otprilike 2 godine	Sers seewälder, bis jetzt gibt es keine Änderungen und stimme dazu das 'proposed' eher besser ist.
133728072	prije više od 2 godine	It's more of a tourist attraction than really a roof. Technically it can be used as a shelter, though it's not its intended purpose.
128565786	prije skoro 3 godine	comment should be: update lengths of shops
114762344	prije skoro 3 godine	Hey, it seems like you dropped the SAC scale from T3 to T2 for osm.org/way/113340334. Recently did the hike and wouldn't agree. Can you explain what source you were referencing?
124451990	prije otprilike 3 godine	The only reason it is big is that on the same upload two small changes were added. Confused why StreetComplete did it that way...
120122994	prije više od 3 godine	cool danke
120122994	prije više od 3 godine	gibt es im nachhinein den history aus zu bessern?
120122994	prije više od 3 godine	Probiere meistens den Lösungsweg zu nehmen, solange die Änderungen nicht zu schwer/nervig machbar sind. Vielleicht sollte ich höheren Priorität setzen auf schon ältere Gebäuden (zumindens Versionsgeschichte mäßig).
120122994	prije više od 3 godine	sollte mit diesen Changeset verbessert sein: osm.org/changeset/120175488
120062777	prije više od 3 godine	Danke für den Hinweis. Habe sie schon verbessert.
115898410	prije više od 3 godine	Referenced the wrong building off their website
114161027	prije skoro 4 godine	Genau, also Rathaus is wieder am früheren Standort, aber immer noch teilweise Baustelle.