Hi Allison P,
Thanks for checking our edits. Apologies for the miss. I have modified the access to customers. change set : 99297792
Regards,
Branib

Hi,
Thanks for your valuable inputs, will consider this learning in my future edits.
Thanks&Regards,
Branib

Hi,
Thanks for your feedback, but we are not able to grasp your concern here. I can find the roads we have created are inline with Bing imagery, which has minimum offset. We are using adjust imagery offset in id editor to add data whenever we see imagery is offset.Are you suggesting us to add or align roads only based on OS Open data? Kindly suggest us with the appropriate action. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks &Regards,
branib

Hi ToniE,
Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies for the delayed response. I have mistakenly modified the access tags. Thanks for the quick correction. I will make sure to perform my future edits very carefully with all the available resources. Once again, thanks for clearly explaining the issue and making the necessary changes. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks&Regards,
branib

Hi Michael,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have modified the highway tag with starting segment as service and the remaining road to parking aisle as it is leading to the parking lot. Please correct me if I am wrong and it requires any further modifications. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks&Regards,
Branib

Hi,
Thanks for the response. we have received the feed back from our driver that the road is accessible by motor vehicles and cross verified the same with the available aerial imagery(map box,maxar,etc.). based on that,I have modified a part of the segment to service road. we have not made any changes to the bridle path since we have no enough resources to validate it. please let me know the required modifications to improvise my edits. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks&Regards,
branib

Hi,
Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made this edit based on the driver feedback and available resources. It can be helpful if the local knowledge can improvise our edits. Please go ahead and make the necessary changes. I have made this edits with the available resources. please correct me if I am wrong and suggest the required modifications. Always happy to learn from the community
Thank&Regards,
branib

Hi,
Thanks for your time for checking our edits. I have wrongly connected the service road with the footpath by checking from the aerial view. Please let me know in case of any more modifications required. Once again, thanks for making the necessary corrections. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks&Regards,
Branib

Hi,
Thanks for your time for checking our edits. I have wrongly connected the service road with the footpath by checking from the aerial view. Please let me know in case of any more modifications required. Once again, thanks for making the necessary corrections. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks&Regards,
B.Pushpa Rani

Hi,
Thanks for your time for checking our edits. I have wrongly connected the service road with the footpath by checking from the aerial view. Please let me know in case of any more modifications required. Once again, thanks for making the necessary corrections. Always happy to learn from the community.
Thanks & Regards,
Branib

Hi BCNorwich,

Thank you for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake made me. I have rectified the mistake (#74170073). I will be more careful going forward and would not commit such error. Let me know in case you have any more suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards
Branib

Hi,

Thanks for sharing the query. I have identified the similar changesets with the help of this query and reverted the changes as per the community's feedback.

Let me know in case you have any further suggestion.

Best Regards
branib

Hi,

Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.

Changeset: osm.org/changeset/72307757

Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.

Regards,
branib

Hi,

Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.

Changeset: osm.org/changeset/72307918

Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.

Regards,
branib

Hi tux67,

Thanks for your comments. I didn't add this information as I was not sure if the elevation was a gate or just a barrier to restrict heavy vehicles to enter into this road. But as per your confirmation I am adding the gate information.

Regards,
branib

Hi Andy,

Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.

Changeset: osm.org/changeset/71937852

Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.

Regards,
branib

Hi,

Thanks for writing to me. As suggested, I have gone through the feedback provided by community and responded on those comments.

Regards,
branib

Hi,

Thanks for your feedback and correcting the edit by changing road classification.

Regards,
branib

Hi,

Thanks for your feedback and correcting the edit. I will consider the feedback for further edits.

Regards,
branib

Hi,

Thank you for providing your feedback and correcting the road classification. Please let me know if there are any other suggestions.

regards,
branib