I think this was from years ago before pipeline=marker. I usually use the new format now as it appears in JOSM as a preset. If you feel strongly about this feel free to change them - it's way down on my mapping priorities

thanks - fixed

Welcome to OSM. As you learn please be absolutuely sure about your edits before you upload. There's lots of help available. I've reverted your 3 nodes: postcodes need to be attached to an object that can be verified on the ground such as a building or a shop node and names do have to be meaningful. Have another go

I've removed this data and returned the building to its original state. Warwick in the UK is not Tanzania! Please be more careful as you learn

Should it be BOC Industrial Gases rather than the full name?

Why are you editing nonsense in Warwickshire England for a project in Tanzania?

Hi

Didn't know they existed. Done now.

We don't map for the standard render.We map what's there. You're shoehorning a tag with a totally diiferent useage in order to get a rendered affect. If landuse=highway doesn't get rendered but that's the tag to use then use it.Someone will render it - maybe even you. If you have to sue something then use landuse=grass.
The legality of the extent of the highway refers to all traffic on the highway not just to one class of traffic and clearly there is vehicle access on these roads and thus it is not a pedestrian only area. Please stop using this tag inappropriately

Good luck with improving the accuracy but be careful with confusing landcover with landuse- what's pasture this year could be arable next year and then scrub when used with set aside subsidy - but it's still all farmland.

Hi Martin

You've managed to break several relations that I took a long time to edit. If you insist on repeating work and subdividing relations into field parcels at least be courteous enough to leave the existing relation until you're finished. Can you restore my relations please until you're finished? Why repeat work of others when there are loads of white spaces to complete?

This is not how this tag is designed to be used. From the wiki: A highway=pedestrian is a road or an area mainly or exclusively for pedestrians in which some vehicle traffic may be authorized (e.g. emergency, taxi, delivery, ...). Typically found in shopping areas, town centres, places with tourism attractions and recreation/civic areas, where wide expanses of hard surface are provided for pedestrians to walk.

Thanks Mike - access restriction for all classes now explicitly tagged. I've also added a note to all roads affected stating the likely length of closure and the reason

Brian

Hi Dave

Sorry you find it more difficult to edit these as relations. I'd be interested to learn from you how it is more difficult. Maybe it's a good thing as it discourages the inexperienced from fiddling. Anyway they're pretty stable entities and shouldn't need too much editing.

The way I'm doing things is just plain easier and faster ( and I believe a cleaner way ultimately) to draw multiploygons. Making it easier for you makes it more difficult for me

Fields or larger areas for farmland? Last time I checked on the wiki it was an "open question" thus making either equally valid. Another instance of OSM ambiguity I'm afraid

Regards

Brian

I agree - isolated roads left not connecting to anything

Probably needs a revert: there are roads that are not connected

it's what comes up in JOSM presets

Thanks for the tip Jerry. Moor Street viaduct fixed - I've joined the across member ways to the outline member

Relation has been successfully recovered

Please be careful - this changeset has deleted the entire relation for the Warwickshire Centenary Way! It's going to be hard work recreating it.

This footpath is a public right of way according to Warwicks CC. You have it as access=no. Do you mean no access for vehicles?