brianboru's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
111263392 | over 3 years ago | Hi Mike - my edit didn't touch that tag - better to take it up with the actual editor. I'm actually indifferent about the issue Regards Brian |
72006883 | almost 4 years ago | brainfart of epic proportion! |
112620854 | almost 4 years ago | this is a designated public footpath so bicycle=yes is not correct |
111145509 | almost 4 years ago | oops1 mre finger touble now fixed |
111146059 | almost 4 years ago | oops! finger touble - now fixed |
103839130 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Jerry If you feel that is most appropriate then go ahead and change it. Your knowledge is superior to mine Regards Brian |
108628260 | almost 4 years ago | deleted |
108628260 | almost 4 years ago | Does this business really exist inside Waitrose? I shop there and haven't noticed it. I suspect this is the location you've copied from Google Maps. Also the address quoted doesn't exist so it can't be mapped accurately. One for deletion I'm afraid |
109539763 | almost 4 years ago | No responsefrom you so changeset reverted |
109539763 | almost 4 years ago | Please stop what you are doing until you know better. You have deleted a section of the River Corve and removed many relations that were were a result of a day's work. I shall probably revert this entire edit |
109521655 | almost 4 years ago | Thanks Colin I'll take a look |
106522655 | almost 4 years ago | Please be careful when editing relations: this changeset broke multiple relations which took a lot of fixing |
105815624 | about 4 years ago | Thanks for the suggestion but my tag was chosen precisely so that there were would be no render and also serve to deter anyone else from recovering the trees from outdated aerial imagery Tree stump not appropriate - not visible in the piles of wood/branches left after felling |
102999836 | about 4 years ago | No problems. Will do |
102999836 | about 4 years ago | No need I did this deliberately to save myself work in case the situation reverses if BCC decide to remove the popup cycle lane in the road which currently makes this shared cycle/footpath redundant and I have to reinstate it Regards Brian |
74106495 | over 4 years ago | please be careful with your sources one of your footpaths (way 722066183) goes straight through a building |
103151959 | over 4 years ago | You haven't kept boundary and landuse separate - you've deleted landuse. I've re-added landuse. This is an important landmark in the west midlands and needs to be shown as forest. |
4357649 | over 4 years ago | Because I don't have sufficient knowledge of pipeline topography to know where a section ref starts and finishes |
101062191 | over 4 years ago | Interested to know to source and licence for the data for the proposed road |
102439983 | over 4 years ago | These are terraced houses and are all joined together they are not separate- easiest to bulk delete them and start again! |