Oh sorry, that was not meant to be uploaded! I was testing out some minor functionality in my app and forgot to undo the edits before heading off to do some real mapping, and the test edits got caught up in the upload.

That’s great information. Looking at the Apple Maps 3-D flyover view makes it all very obvious, pretty much what I thought it was like originally. Everything around there is somewhat misaligned with the MapBox imagery, I’ll try to fix it up as best I can to make it consistent.

I notice you haven’t made any edits yourself, feel free to jump in since it seems you have local knowledge.

Yes I agree with you. I was going off the horribly aligned Bing imagery and trying to route it to the parking lot down there. Should it connect to the node you mention or end right next to it?

I sympathize with your position. In OSM there are lots of situations (e.g. Russia/Crimea) where the morally correct map disagrees with the situation real people encounter while navigating the world. As a project we’ve chosen to resolve these conflicts by mapping what’s seen “on the ground”, so if the signs, authorities, etc. that a traveler would encounter say the name is Rainier, then that’s what should be mapped. There’s definitely a place to lobby for the original name, but in OSM we want to focus on what’s most useful to people using the map in the real world.

The original name appears in the old_name tag, and you can also add it to name:sal (Salish).

While I understand that there are good reasons to (officially) restore the name of the mountain, similar to how Denali was renamed, until a widely-recognized official change occurs we should use the most widely used name: Rainier

I’m in Sedona now and hiked to, and mapped, Subway cave, which is to my knowledge in a totally different area than where you placed it. Based on searches for “Sedona subway cave” the one I mapped in Boynton Canyon seems the better match.

I also don’t see any trails accessing the location you mapped. What do you think?

osm.org/node/9061254982

Okay no problem. Thanks!

I'm trying to add support in my app ("Go Map!!") for editing near the south pole. I happened to notice that this changeset added some empty nodes at (-90,0):
9043819895
9043819896
9043819897
9043819898

As part of this changeset you edited osm.org/node/7666504809/history which is in the incorrect location, and is also a duplicate of osm.org/node/5314074411/history (which is in the correct location). Could you delete this node as well as the associated path that is connected to it?

I’ve reverted this change and others. Please don’t upload changes unlike they reflect ground-truth.

Fixed.

Looking over the edits the road deletions I saw are within the “Morogoro - Makutopora SGR” construction area. You can modify a relation (safely) by splitting a way that belongs to a route relation.

Thanks! Yes looks like a bug.

This edit lost the building=yes tag. I’d like to confirm whether this is due to a Go Map!! bug or because you modified the tags manually. Thanks!

GPX trace I made today:
osm.org/user/bryceco/traces/3527206

Mapping right in front of my house! 😂

Ha ha, didn’t try them out, maybe next time!

Is way 804714457 something you added just to help align the nodes? Do you mind if I delete it? This is just a few blocks from my house so I like to keep the area tidy :)

All changes are public. If you delete something accidentally you should try to restore it yourself if possible.

I understand that amenity=yes isn’t great, but amenity=office is simply wrong. It’s much closer to something like a photography studio, except they produce sculptures.