Hey,
species:wikidata=* ist für Links zu Wikidata und species=* für den wissenschaftlichen Namen der Art.

Hey,
you've added wikidata=Q287684g at osm.org/node/2016804222, osm.org/node/7624445578 and osm.org/node/2016804203.
I assumed you meant wikidata=Q287684 as it is close and the Wikidata item seems to match. I have changed it in osm.org/changeset/86941341.

Hey,

Ficus benghalensis is a taxon of type species. So there is no reason to add "taxon"="not known". What did you want to say with it? (You could add species:wikidata=Q1405636 to it, though.)

What's your source for the population? You added "source"="own observation". I doubt that.

> I can't understand what problem with this please inform me in details why the bug is showing there

What was the error message? Had it to do with your Wikipedia and Wikidata tag? They should link to a Wikipedia article and a Wikidata item respectively. I couldn't find them, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

CamelCaseNick

For now population and postal code are fixed. Thank You!

You wanted to share a screenshot? Sorry, for that you would need an image hosting service, as it is not possible in this changeset comments.

But don't hesitate to ask questions and map yourself.

And maybe you find a way to contact the community at https://openstreetmap.community/.

So, yes, now “Blackfoot Alberta T0B0L0” and “Blackfoot Alberta T0B0L0” work on OSM search.

Hmm... What you describe is odd. Using the OpenStreetMap internal search, I find Blackfoot with

* Blackfoot Alberta
* Blackfoot, Alberta
* Blackfoot
* Blackfoot Alberta T0B0L0
* Blackfoot County of Vermilion River
* Blackfoot, County of Vermilion River
* Blackfoot, County of Vermilion River, Alberta

just not with Blackfoot Alberta T0B0L0.

What was missing indeed was the postal_code=T0B0L0 tag. I have added it now in osm.org/changeset/86917072. I hope to see that to solve this issue with the postal code.

I have checked whether Google Maps finds it, but of course, I cannot copy Google Maps. (And I don't need to as a resident there, you know it, right?)

> Nobody uses Hamlet for postage nor the signage.

It's just a classification. It's the place type as Blackfoot is a hamlet in Alberta. It is not showing up as “hamlet” on any map.

> The aerial view is from over 15 years ago.

That's unfortunate as it's the best and most accurate way to trace buildings. Have you checked every available aerial imagery in the editor (you used the standard editor iD: on the right, you would find a tab to change the background)?

> It's a bigger area.

You are talking about the residential area osm.org/way/310296966? Sorry, with outdated imagery, I cannot help you remote. Maybe you could walk around it and trace your why with GPS and upload a GPX file to then fix it?

For all the things you miss on the map: Buildings, businesses, restaurants, supermarkets, whatever it is: Feel free to add it. The editor standard iD you used has some great presets.

Hey,
is osm.org/way/808028681 supposed to be the school, you added with osm.org/node/7556083734? There is no need for a node and a way. Just add the amenity=school and the name= tag to the way.

Therefore, for osm.org/way/213497168 there is also no need for osm.org/node/7556068634.

CamelCaseNick

And osm.org/node/7562215772 a duplicate of osm.org/way/212500740?

Also is osm.org/node/7562226080 a duplicate of osm.org/way/212500738?

Hey,
there is already a osm.org/way/45743889 for the Rumi Gate.
Is this gate indeed the one described there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumi_Darwaza? Then a Wikipedia article could be referenced.
Why did you add osm.org/node/7562226079 as a memorial? Is there a memorial next to the gate? Or is the gate the memorial.
CamelCaseNick

Sind Leeste und Erichshof Ortsteile von Weyhe? (also osm.org/relation/20101) So lese ich den Wikipedia-Artikel de:Weyhe.
Hier liegt aber Leeste in Erichshof? Außerdem passen jetzt Wikipedia- und Wikidata-Tag nicht zusammen.

Hey,
what do you mean at osm.org/node/7598642015 with the artist_name, inscription, start_date, wikipedia tags?
CamelCaseNick

I think, it should be wikidata=Q1226524?

Hey,
why the wikipedia link (missing the de:) to Dinkelacker-Schwaben Bräu and the wikidata link to Dinkelacker and not Dinkelacker-Schwaben Bräu?
CamelCaseNick

Why did you remove the essential language part of the wikipedia tag?

The previously tagged article de:Mendrisio (Kreis) was moved to de:Kreis Mendrisio without a redirect in place.

Hey,
you removed the Wikipedia and Wikidata links for the lake.
Even though Wikipedia doesn't currently use the official name of it, the article is still about this lake, isn't it?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
this Wikipedia is no invalid. Maybe
wikipedia=gl:Cristosende, A Teixeira
for https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cristosende,_A_Teixeira? And is this that and not https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cristosende,_Cristosende,_A_Teixeira?
CamelCaseNick

Hallo,

> ich weiß nicht genau, wie man das nennt
ja, das ist eine Profanierung o. Entweihung.

> Ich verstehe dich so, dass du ein Merkmal dran lassen willst, weil das Gebäude als Ex-Kirche besichtigt werden könnte?
Ja, das war mein Ansinn.

> Es sollte aber nicht christlich oder katholisch dranstehen, das trifft nicht zu.
Daher hatte ich den disused:amenity im Vorschlag. Um klar deutlich zu machen, dass man es als Kirchen-architektonisches Werk sehen kann, aber nicht mehr als Gebetsstätte und Ort der Glaubensausübung.

> Bin auch kein Profi-Karthograf.
Ich auch nicht.

> Wen es dir möglich ist, schicke mir bitte mal einen Link
Der Link zu Wikidata ist http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q42301991. Dieser Wikidata-Eintrag ist auch verbunden mit dem Wikipedia-Artikel zu der ehemaligen Kirche: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Theresia_vom_Kinde_Jesu_(Eschede).

CamelCaseNick

Hey,
why did you delete multiple name tags and the link to https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q15166148?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
this seems odd to me. You have added a Wikidata tag for a short film here a fixed the Wikipedia tag accordingly.
As you may already know: The film is solely shown here. And I couldn't find anything but this film, that is shown here.
This theater is not a film nevertheless. I thought about using subject:* tagging, but that isn't 100 % correct as well.
CamelCaseNick

p.s.: Due to a now fixed bug in the task manager I had the same task.