Ich hatte am westlichen Ende denselben Knoten verwendet, weil ich es geometrisch für sinnvoll hielt. Am östlichen hatte ich mich ja für zwei getrennte Knoten entschieden. (Das hatte ma-rt-in später geändert.) Ich entscheide also durchaus situationsabhängig. Sicher immer für das eine o. das andere zu entscheiden, wie im Forum wohl diskutiert, halte ich auch für nicht sinnvoll, aber das lag ja hier nicht vor.

> Warum diskutiert ihr das in einer Telegramm-Gruppe?
Wir haben nicht genau dieses Thema in der Telegram-Gruppe diskutiert, sondern ein Routing-Problem und dabei sind wir auf die fehlenden Verkehrsschilder, die fehlenden dritte Spuren gekommen und, dass es sich um ein highway=primary_link und nicht highway=primary handelt.

> Wäre da nicht das OSM-Forum passender?
Beide Kommunikationskanäle bieten Vor- und Nachteile. 🤷‍♂️

> Ich habe kein WhatsApp und brauche auch kein Telegramm.
Das Gute ist, dass die Telegram-Gruppe genauso wenig normativ ist, wie das Forum. Um zu diskutieren, interessante Dinge auszutauschen, u. v. m. kann man sich nach Belieben Kommunikationskanäle aussuchen. Du musst also gar kein Telegram-Account haben.

> So verlaufen die Straßenverbindungern nicht.

Wie verlaufen sie denn? Es sind jedenfalls je drei wegen der Insel, die man auch auf den Luftbildern, sowie den OSC-Bildern sehen kann.

> Bitte unterlasse künftig solche Änderungen.

Bisher hast Du nur Dein Unmut bekundet, aber nicht, woher er kommt.

Hey,
did you mean wikidata=Q7864927 for osm.org/way/824380390?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
at Comisaría Morón 2° you added a ) in the Wikidata id.
May I recommend to use operator:wikidata=Q4985546 on these police stations instead of wikidata=Q4985546?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
while wikipedia=* is only for exact matches between the article and the OSM element, url=* is pretty generic (and nearly 4 out of 5 usages come from imports, see https://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/url/), so if possible, I had used another tag.
Could subject:wikipedia=* work here or is url=* really the only option?
CamelCaseNick

Hola,
wikipedia=* está pensada para enlaces a Wikipedia. Para las descripciones está description=*.
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
the Aldi should have been a brand:wikidata=Q41171373, right? (It is Aldi Nord in Belgium?)
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
why did you add wikidata=5 to osm.org/way/40388765? What do you mean with it?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
Wikipedia has no article Achiwuib. Is en:Achiwib and the corresponding Q4673804 not about this place? Those seem to match.
(And the link at name:source here does not mention Achiwuib.)
CamelCaseNick

Hallo,
weshalb wurden die Links zu Wikipedia und Wikidata des Landeszeughauses entfernt? Ist das etwa nicht genau dort?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
your Wikipedia tag at osm.org/node/7377402573 does not have a language in it and seems not to be about en:Vargem or any municipality linked from pt:Vargem. What is it?
CamelCaseNick

Hallo,
ich verstehe den Wikipedia-Tag an osm.org/node/687052560 nicht bzw. kann nicht erahnen, was es hätte wirklich sein sollen. Wo findet man das bei Wikipedia?
CamelCaseNick

Hey,
species:wikidata=* ist für Links zu Wikidata und species=* für den wissenschaftlichen Namen der Art.

Hey,
you've added wikidata=Q287684g at osm.org/node/2016804222, osm.org/node/7624445578 and osm.org/node/2016804203.
I assumed you meant wikidata=Q287684 as it is close and the Wikidata item seems to match. I have changed it in osm.org/changeset/86941341.

Hey,

Ficus benghalensis is a taxon of type species. So there is no reason to add "taxon"="not known". What did you want to say with it? (You could add species:wikidata=Q1405636 to it, though.)

What's your source for the population? You added "source"="own observation". I doubt that.

> I can't understand what problem with this please inform me in details why the bug is showing there

What was the error message? Had it to do with your Wikipedia and Wikidata tag? They should link to a Wikipedia article and a Wikidata item respectively. I couldn't find them, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

CamelCaseNick

For now population and postal code are fixed. Thank You!

You wanted to share a screenshot? Sorry, for that you would need an image hosting service, as it is not possible in this changeset comments.

But don't hesitate to ask questions and map yourself.

And maybe you find a way to contact the community at https://openstreetmap.community/.

So, yes, now “Blackfoot Alberta T0B0L0” and “Blackfoot Alberta T0B0L0” work on OSM search.

Hmm... What you describe is odd. Using the OpenStreetMap internal search, I find Blackfoot with

* Blackfoot Alberta
* Blackfoot, Alberta
* Blackfoot
* Blackfoot Alberta T0B0L0
* Blackfoot County of Vermilion River
* Blackfoot, County of Vermilion River
* Blackfoot, County of Vermilion River, Alberta

just not with Blackfoot Alberta T0B0L0.

What was missing indeed was the postal_code=T0B0L0 tag. I have added it now in osm.org/changeset/86917072. I hope to see that to solve this issue with the postal code.

I have checked whether Google Maps finds it, but of course, I cannot copy Google Maps. (And I don't need to as a resident there, you know it, right?)

> Nobody uses Hamlet for postage nor the signage.

It's just a classification. It's the place type as Blackfoot is a hamlet in Alberta. It is not showing up as “hamlet” on any map.

> The aerial view is from over 15 years ago.

That's unfortunate as it's the best and most accurate way to trace buildings. Have you checked every available aerial imagery in the editor (you used the standard editor iD: on the right, you would find a tab to change the background)?

> It's a bigger area.

You are talking about the residential area osm.org/way/310296966? Sorry, with outdated imagery, I cannot help you remote. Maybe you could walk around it and trace your why with GPS and upload a GPX file to then fix it?

For all the things you miss on the map: Buildings, businesses, restaurants, supermarkets, whatever it is: Feel free to add it. The editor standard iD you used has some great presets.

Hey,
is osm.org/way/808028681 supposed to be the school, you added with osm.org/node/7556083734? There is no need for a node and a way. Just add the amenity=school and the name= tag to the way.

Therefore, for osm.org/way/213497168 there is also no need for osm.org/node/7556068634.

CamelCaseNick

And osm.org/node/7562215772 a duplicate of osm.org/way/212500740?