OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
82272208 over 5 years ago

Hey,

appointment ist kein korrekter OH-Wert, leider.
Es gab zwar mal osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Opening_hours:_standard_appointment_syntax. Daraus wurde (bisher?) aber nichts.

Man könnte hier evtl.
opening_hours=unknown "Termin nach Vereinbarung / on appointment"
setzt.

CamelCaseNick

79990882 over 5 years ago

Dann freue ich mich auf die Zukunft.

82129384 over 5 years ago

Du hast hier ein Review beantragt.
Diese Relation ist nach dem 2007 Proposal, das nicht mehr verwendet wird. (Nicht zu verwechseln mit der aktuellen Nutzung von type=building)

82206544 over 5 years ago

Sorry, this is about the lake Ichkeul. The wikidata item is correct though.

79990882 over 5 years ago

Hey,
soll hier check_date=2020-01-21 sein? Ist wohl sicher ein Tippfehler.
Wenn nicht: Wie ist so die Zukunft? 😉
CamelCaseNick

82137873 over 5 years ago

Okay, Thanks!
I just saw the Wikipedia article was written in present. 🤷‍♂️

82174434 over 5 years ago

Hey,
why did you remove wikipedia=ku:Zêdiyê here?
You have added it again in osm.org/changeset/82175375 and the correct wikidata tag, Thanks!
Just, why did you then leave the undocumented and unproposed wiki_link?
Shouldn't it be removed and where does it come from?
CamelCaseNick

82116803 over 5 years ago

But the article mentions the current name (same for the wikidata item) and the renovation plans, so that article will likely continue to be relevant for this hotel.

82137873 over 5 years ago

Hey,
what are your sources that the bridge is no more part of the NRHP as heritage? And what are the problems with the Wikipedia and Wikidata tags?
CamelCaseNick

82116803 over 5 years ago

Hey,
why did you remove the Wikipedia and Wikidata links?
Those describe that hotel, right?
Was that an accident?
CamelCaseNick

82117712 over 5 years ago

Hey,
doesn't "doplněna wikidata" mean you wanted to add a wikidata tag? You removed one, you had added a minute earlier.
And wikidata=Q1468337 doesn't look so bad.
Was this an accident, that you removed it or that you had added it?
CamelCaseNick

82093560 over 5 years ago

landuse=religious is normally used for places of worship, e.g. the area around a church.
A shop=funeral_directors might have a religion tag. Does this funeral director have a specific religion? Then you might find the correct religion (and maybe denomination) tags in osm.wiki/Key:religion#Values_for_religion.
If this funeral director is open to any religion, just omit that tag – that should only be used, when there are specific religions preferred by them.

82093560 over 5 years ago

Hey,
what do you mean with religion=yes?
CamelCaseNick

82089494 over 5 years ago

Hey,
was the deletion of wikidata=Q17741298 intentional?
CamelCaseNick

82015558 over 5 years ago

Hallo,

Du hast hier das Wikipedia tag bearbeitet. Den Wikipedia-Artikel gibt es gar nicht – dann einfach kein Tag.

Ich denke osm.org/node/7282751777 sollte

wikipedia=de:Sloopsteine von Haltern
wikidata=Q2294404

erhalten. Liege ich da richtig?

CamelCaseNick

81893880 over 5 years ago

Hey,
you have added four operator:wikidata and four brand:wikidata tags here. Those are not wikidata ids. For example an id would be Q2629881. Look at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2629881 for what it is.
Can you add the correct wikidata ids? You find links to them on Wikipedia articles.
Thank You!
CamelCaseNick

82019675 over 5 years ago

Hey,
you have added suburbs? Great! Thank You!

I just have problems with your 19 wikipedia and wikidata tags. Wikipedia tags should state the language, e.g. wikipedia=es:Nuevitas, so the format is wikpedia=[language code]:[article title].

And correct Wikidata tags are also important. A correct ID would be for example Q643081 for Nuevitas.

Can you look through those objects and maybe make sure those tags will be correct?

And would you please in the future not add all suburbs _and_ that many buildings in one changeset? It makes it substantially harder to look through the changesets for mistakes and hence help you make the map a better one.

What are your sources? source=yes is not extremely descriptive.

Otherwise! Go ahead and map!

Thanks!
CamelCaseNick

81961587 over 5 years ago

Hey,
if fixed the wikipedia tag for the relation and added the corresponding wikidata tag.
I have deleted the wikipedia tag on the boundary on purpose, since those normally don't have the external identifiers as well.
So it was indeed on purpose, but maybe I missed something...

81936318 over 5 years ago

Hey,

thanks for added a Dunkin' Donuts! You have removed Mount Vernon from the map for that though.

I have reverted your changeset in osm.org/changeset/81959087. But no worry! I have re-added your Dunkin' Donuts to a new node.
This map large enough to fit Mount Vernon and a Dunkin' Donuts onto it. 😉

If you are sure, that Mount Vernon is indeed gone, just undo my revert.

CamelCaseNick

81935989 over 5 years ago

see osm.org/changeset/81936036, a revert of mine, if you wonder about the large bbox