開放街圖標誌 OpenStreetMap 開放街圖

Brisbane Valley Rail Trail Needs Mapping

於 2009年十二月15日 由 chas678English發表。

A number of sections of the BVRT are already open, including a new section at the end of November.
The rail trail has a website at http://www.brisbanevalleyrailtrail.org.au it's not yet been mapped: osm.org/go/ueEzWh

I'd be keen to map them, it seems OSM has nice tags for RailTrails already : osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Rail_Trails

So... anyone up for a bike ride?

位置: Stafford Heights, City of Brisbane, Queensland, 4032, Australia
電子郵件圖示 藍天圖示 Facebook 圖示 LinkedIn 圖示 乳齒象圖示 Telegram 圖示 X 圖示

討論

AshKyd2009年12月15日 11時01分 發表的評論

Interesting, I didn't realise we had anything like that. I'll have to check it out (whether someone else gets a trace of it first or not.)

AshKyd2009年12月15日 13時12分 發表的評論

I noticed you just put in a section, but it needs a highway designation too.

Looks like it might very well be highway=track (out of the options of track & path. Check that wiki page for a rationale.)

Good work though. :)

chas6782009年12月16日 00時49分 發表的評論

Thanks Ash - I forgot to add highway=track :-)

Unusual User Name2009年12月16日 03時39分 發表的評論

I'm pleased to find the rail trail is finally happening.

Considering that the rail trail association has no maps whatsoever on their site, mapping it would be a doubly good idea.

Can't help out though, sorry.

daveemtb2009年12月17日 14時28分 發表的評論

I never understood why the wiki currently says not to add "railway=abandoned" to these kind of trails. It's accurate as the features of an abandoned railway remain (eg cuttings and embankments), it's useful info for cyclists as it tells you a lot about the gradients you might expect, and it's useful for people researching former railways. Surely renderers should be able to handle not plotting it as an abandoned railway on top of the cycleway, if that's really considered to be undesirable for the sake of clarity.

AshKyd2009年12月19日 09時52分 發表的評論

Yeah, that is odd. :/

The course of a former railway which has been abandoned and the track and infrastucture removed.

That sounds kind of counterintuitive to not tag it as such. As there's no justification for that statement on the wiki, I'd probably tag it anyway.

AshKyd2009年12月19日 11時43分 發表的評論

I've edited the wiki. Nobody in #osm and #osm-au can think of any reason not to tag it such.

登入 來留下評論