OpenStreetMap-logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset Wannear Reäksje
104054758 mear as 4 jier lyn

Hello. Can I ask why you have removed this path twice now? This is a formal public footpath which goes across open grassland in the park. I walk this route regularly so know it exists.

100648157 mear as 4 jier lyn

Hello. No I haven't received any of your replies.

100648157 mear as 4 jier lyn

What is the source for these changes? You have removed a viewing platform and made a range of other changes without any reference to what is on the ground.

100218182 mear as 4 jier lyn

Hello. What is your source for adding this footway? You appear to have added a footway which doesn't exist on the ground.

98162297 mear as 4 jier lyn

Hello. What is the source for this edit? I walk this way regularly and the footway you have added does not exist.

96857385 mear as 4 jier lyn

Hi Robert, you seem to have shifted this footpath several metres north of where the official Norfolk County Council signage on the ground indicates it starts and ends (there's a fingerpost at the western end where it joins the A1066 and a post with official waymarkers / arrows on at the eastern end where it joint RB35. I know you're aligning things to the GIS data, but given the GIS data isn't the definitive maps, doesn't the official on-the-ground signage trump it?

96686212 mear as 4 jier lyn

Hi Robert. No need for the fixme tag here. I set the access tags based on the signage on the ground which is a ‘no vehicles’ sign (one of these https://images.app.goo.gl/RyQM3SAz3SRtZLqE9) at the southern end at the point of the bollards.

89874265 hast 5 jier lyn

Thanks for picking up. This is a typo on my part. Just had a look back at the picture I took and it's actually supposed to be IP14 8083. Will correct now.