We're approaching the third anniversary of my pointing out on the wiki (and IRC, IIRC) that the GADM boundaries were apparently encumbered such that we couldn't use them. Like this. Which sort of begs the question of why it's still in the database, or why people have indeed continued adding them (in Ecuador and across the Middle East).
So, what are we going to do about them?
Discussion
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ TomH ߟߊ߫ 30 September 2011 at 07:34 ߘߐ߫
Well have you ever followed the correct procedure for data sourced from in appropriate sources and (a) asked the person adding it to remote it and (b) if they fail to do so then to report it to the Data Working Group?
ߡߙߌߣߊ߲ ߞߊ߬ ߝߘߊ߫ chriscf ߟߊ߫ 30 September 2011 at 13:32 ߘߐ߫
I figured the community at large might want to know before they find one day that a bunch of boundaries and parts of the Antarctic coastline have disappeared.