compdude's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
90049536 | over 4 years ago | ^ That was what I had to do to get the most up-to-date map tiles. |
90049536 | over 4 years ago | They should be gone by now, at least for me. If you don't see them gone for you, try holding down the shift key and pressing refresh on your browser, this will tell your browser to bypass the cache and actually reload the page. |
90049536 | over 4 years ago | Yeah, the dashed lines mean that there's an access=no tag on that road segment. I figured this might have been just a mistake or just a temporary road closure that someone added and forgot to remove. |
90049536 | over 4 years ago | Is this road still closed? |
93957434 | over 4 years ago | I already fixed this for you, but please be sure that when you have motorways crossing each other, that there is a bridge tag encompassing the entire length of the overpass. |
93023618 | over 4 years ago | How is this "Not long enough of a segment between intersections?" It's over 5 miles. There are many freeways of that length. |
72727472 | almost 5 years ago | Is this really the actual name of the road? |
90139764 | almost 5 years ago | Historic Route 66 does not qualify as a trunk road. Current standard practice in the US is to tag a road as a trunk road only if it is divided with at grade intersections (i.e. one step down from a freeway). Again, please change it back to how it was before. |
91241306 | almost 5 years ago | Please make sure you don't tag administrative areas such as this relation (osm.org/relation/187249) as a building. The building=yes should only be used to represent a building's footprint. I'm assuming you just made a mistake here, so I'm going to go ahead and remove the building=yes tag from the administrative boundary relation. |
86833183 | almost 5 years ago | Not all of Loop 338 should be tagged as a motorway; the motorway tag should only be used for roads that are actually freeways. Please change it back to how it was before, thanks! |
89599850 | almost 5 years ago | Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! In case you weren't aware, the general consensus in the US is that roads should be tagged as highway=trunk if they are a high-speed divided highway with at-grade intersections. (i.e. almost a freeway) This means that I-15 Business should not be tagged as a trunk road as it doesn't meet those requirements. Please change it back to how it was before, thanks! |
89391271 | almost 5 years ago | Noticed you retagged some of the heath as farmland. Not sure if that's correct; didn't think there was any farmland in this area. |
89390633 | almost 5 years ago | It looks like you changed some of the natural=heath in this area to landuse=farmland, which I don't think is correct either. (pretty sure there's no farmland here in the middle of the desert) |
73816701 | almost 5 years ago | Is this road still closed? |
87894057 | about 5 years ago | Please stop changing the name of this city. You have done this multiple times, and that is considered vandalism. Please stop doing this in the future. |
88000815 | about 5 years ago | This should not be tagged as motorcycle parking. Only stalls specifically intended for motorcycles should be tagged with this tag. |
88000877 | about 5 years ago | If a road is closed for construction, the construction=* tag should be construction=primary (or whatever the highway=* tag was--in this case it was tagged as highway=primary, so you should use the construction=primary tag). You tagged it as construction=minor, which has caused this road to disappear from the map. Also construction=minor is not a valid tag--see osm.wiki/Key:construction for valid tags to use on highways under construction. I would appreciate it if you fixed this, thanks! Also, you tagged the opening date as 2020-07-15. Is this correct? |
88031639 | about 5 years ago | Again, please don't tag an area as a building unless that area actually represents the building's footprint, thanks! |
88033533 | about 5 years ago | Please don't tag an area as a building unless that area actually represents a building's footprint. Please remove the building=yes tag, thanks! |
87546573 | about 5 years ago | You're not supposed to tag an area as a building unless it actually represents the footprint of a building. Please edit this area and remove the building=yes tag. Also, please don't put names in all caps. |