OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
90049536 over 4 years ago

^ That was what I had to do to get the most up-to-date map tiles.

90049536 over 4 years ago

They should be gone by now, at least for me. If you don't see them gone for you, try holding down the shift key and pressing refresh on your browser, this will tell your browser to bypass the cache and actually reload the page.

90049536 over 4 years ago

Yeah, the dashed lines mean that there's an access=no tag on that road segment. I figured this might have been just a mistake or just a temporary road closure that someone added and forgot to remove.

90049536 over 4 years ago

Is this road still closed?

93957434 over 4 years ago

I already fixed this for you, but please be sure that when you have motorways crossing each other, that there is a bridge tag encompassing the entire length of the overpass.

93023618 over 4 years ago

How is this "Not long enough of a segment between intersections?" It's over 5 miles. There are many freeways of that length.

72727472 almost 5 years ago

Is this really the actual name of the road?

90139764 almost 5 years ago

Historic Route 66 does not qualify as a trunk road. Current standard practice in the US is to tag a road as a trunk road only if it is divided with at grade intersections (i.e. one step down from a freeway). Again, please change it back to how it was before.

91241306 almost 5 years ago

Please make sure you don't tag administrative areas such as this relation (osm.org/relation/187249) as a building. The building=yes should only be used to represent a building's footprint.

I'm assuming you just made a mistake here, so I'm going to go ahead and remove the building=yes tag from the administrative boundary relation.

86833183 almost 5 years ago

Not all of Loop 338 should be tagged as a motorway; the motorway tag should only be used for roads that are actually freeways. Please change it back to how it was before, thanks!

89599850 almost 5 years ago

Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

In case you weren't aware, the general consensus in the US is that roads should be tagged as highway=trunk if they are a high-speed divided highway with at-grade intersections. (i.e. almost a freeway) This means that I-15 Business should not be tagged as a trunk road as it doesn't meet those requirements.

Please change it back to how it was before, thanks!

89391271 almost 5 years ago

Noticed you retagged some of the heath as farmland. Not sure if that's correct; didn't think there was any farmland in this area.

89390633 almost 5 years ago

It looks like you changed some of the natural=heath in this area to landuse=farmland, which I don't think is correct either. (pretty sure there's no farmland here in the middle of the desert)

73816701 almost 5 years ago

Is this road still closed?

87894057 about 5 years ago

Please stop changing the name of this city. You have done this multiple times, and that is considered vandalism. Please stop doing this in the future.

88000815 about 5 years ago

This should not be tagged as motorcycle parking. Only stalls specifically intended for motorcycles should be tagged with this tag.

88000877 about 5 years ago

If a road is closed for construction, the construction=* tag should be construction=primary (or whatever the highway=* tag was--in this case it was tagged as highway=primary, so you should use the construction=primary tag). You tagged it as construction=minor, which has caused this road to disappear from the map. Also construction=minor is not a valid tag--see osm.wiki/Key:construction for valid tags to use on highways under construction.

I would appreciate it if you fixed this, thanks!

Also, you tagged the opening date as 2020-07-15. Is this correct?

88031639 about 5 years ago

Again, please don't tag an area as a building unless that area actually represents the building's footprint, thanks!

88033533 about 5 years ago

Please don't tag an area as a building unless that area actually represents a building's footprint. Please remove the building=yes tag, thanks!

87546573 about 5 years ago

You're not supposed to tag an area as a building unless it actually represents the footprint of a building. Please edit this area and remove the building=yes tag. Also, please don't put names in all caps.