compdude's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
98090961 | over 4 years ago | There's a very good reason why this is trunk. It is a divided highway. There's no minimum length requirement for how long a divided highway has to be for it to be trunk. Please change this back; thanks! |
98203868 | over 4 years ago | This is clearly a trunk given that it is a divided highway. Please change it back, thanks! |
98430653 | over 4 years ago | But it does meet the qualifications of trunk being that it is almost up to freeway standards with the grade separation. |
98677670 | over 4 years ago | Again, why is this primary? At first glance, this looks like a trunk to me. |
98691442 | over 4 years ago | Can you please make more descriptive changeset descriptions? I have absolutely no idea what this means. It really doesn't take that long.... |
98737846 | over 4 years ago | Have you verified in the aerial imagery that this entire area is actually forests, with no clearings or anything? I find that hard to believe that this *entire* area is all forest. |
98742072 | over 4 years ago | FYI, in Canada, the standards for motorway seem to be different than the US in that they seem to agree that super-twos like this road can be tagged as motorway. There are many super-twos in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia that are tagged as motorway, as well as the the two-lane sections of A-50 in Quebec. In the US, we seem to have come to the agreement that super-twos are trunk, but that does not seem to be the case in Canada. It's important to familiarize yourself with tagging conventions in other countries when you do edits outside of the US. |
98828543 | over 4 years ago | Why is this not a trunk? It looks like it should be a trunk to me. Also, in the future, if you are downgrading a road from trunk please explain why in the change description. |
98953336 | over 4 years ago | I drove this road this past October and it's definitely a trunk. It has a 50 mph speed limit, which I'd say is high enough to qualify as trunk. |
78103766 | over 4 years ago | How are these not trunk roads? They most definitely meet the agreed-upon US definition of a trunk road being a divided highway with at-grade intersections, and from having been on those roads myself, they don't seem any different from HI 380 and HI 311 which are correctly tagged as trunk. |
90401782 | over 4 years ago | This stretch of US 6 appears to be a super-two (undivided 2 lane road with interchanges). Per agreed-upon consensus in the US community, this can and should be tagged as a trunk road. I know you made this change five months ago, but I just noticed this now. Would appreciate if if you changed it back, thanks! |
85669661 | over 4 years ago | Is the US 10 bridge over the river still under construction/closed? |
96033151 | over 4 years ago | You put the Port Angeles Seaplane Base in Kenmore which is obviously not its correct location. Could you please move it to its actual location in Port Angeles? |
90049536 | over 4 years ago | ^ That was what I had to do to get the most up-to-date map tiles. |
90049536 | over 4 years ago | They should be gone by now, at least for me. If you don't see them gone for you, try holding down the shift key and pressing refresh on your browser, this will tell your browser to bypass the cache and actually reload the page. |
90049536 | over 4 years ago | Yeah, the dashed lines mean that there's an access=no tag on that road segment. I figured this might have been just a mistake or just a temporary road closure that someone added and forgot to remove. |
90049536 | over 4 years ago | Is this road still closed? |
93957434 | over 4 years ago | I already fixed this for you, but please be sure that when you have motorways crossing each other, that there is a bridge tag encompassing the entire length of the overpass. |
93023618 | over 4 years ago | How is this "Not long enough of a segment between intersections?" It's over 5 miles. There are many freeways of that length. |
72727472 | almost 5 years ago | Is this really the actual name of the road? |