OpenStreetMap Logo OpenStreetMap

What's the point of all the TIGER tags?

Verfasst von compdude am 22. Juli 2011 in English

I was wondering why there's so many TIGER-related tags on roads uploaded via the TIGER import in the US of A. A lot of them seem to have little purpose, and the only ones that seem to have any chance of survival in life (i.e. won't get deleted by me) are the tiger:county=* tag and the tiger:reviewed=* tag. There's also the tiger:separated=* that I'm wondering about it's purpose.

Could someone more knowledgeable than I answer these questions?
- What's the point of the TIGER tags?
- What's the tiger:separated=* tag for?

Thank you.

E-Mail-Symbol Bluesky-Symbol Facebook-Symbol LinkedIn-Symbol Mastodon-Symbol Telegramm-Symbol X-Symbol

Diskussion

Kommentar von 42429 am 22. Juli 2011 um 22:29 Uhr

- tiger:separated indicates whether it is a divided road.
- If all roads in North America were reviewed manually, TIGER tags would be unnecessary.
- If no roads in North America was reviewed manually, TIGER tags would be necessary in order to import a newer version.
- Given that a small part of North American roads was reviewed manually, it is technically impossible to update TIGER automatically.

Kommentar von Peter Dobratz am 23. Juli 2011 um 00:42 Uhr

Generally, if I have to significantly change the connectedness or the name of a road, then I just delete all the TIGER tags. If I just need to expand the abbreviations in the name, then I just delete the tiger:reviewed tag and leave the other tags.

Kommentar von Tom Layo am 23. Juli 2011 um 14:28 Uhr

Finally, some discussion of this. I have been aligning and editing TIGER data for some months now. The sole value of this data base is the names of roads. Everything else is useless. If I draw a bridge based on Bing, I delete everything below 'tiger reviewed', because it is not based on tiger. When I redraw and city, it is largely based on Bing, not tiger. I haven't been deleting tiger tags, but am always tempted....

The chance that there will be another tiger upload is slim. Our data is now better than anything the gov can make, given their financial condition. It is more likely that they will use our data. They would be stupid not to. Portland, OR uses OSM now, because the mapping company they had been using wanted $100k per year. Other cities will follow, if the data is worth a damn. In many areas it isn't.

But it is not so hard to correct. Pick a city, trust the aerial (if there is a problem I haven't found it yet, and the tiger map is much worse in every case}, and realign the roads. Move the POI to somewhere near where they should be, and this map will be something!

Kommentar von mwbg am 24. Juli 2011 um 17:57 Uhr

What on Earth is TIGER ? I've seen loads of these and thought these comments would answer that, but all the respondents all seem to know what it means !

MWBG

Kommentar von compdude am 25. Juli 2011 um 02:37 Uhr

For all those who are wondering what TIGER is:

TIGER is an import of all the roads in the USA. It's public domain and is used by the government for collecting census data. However, it is REALLY inaccurate and requires some tedious work to align the roads to satellite imagery (this is called TIGER fixup). For more info and a complete description, see osm.wiki/TIGER and osm.wiki/TIGER_fixup

Anmelden, um einen Kommentar zu schreiben