Hallo Difoltuser, ich habe die neuen Häuser von den Bing-Bildern abmalen können (die sind grad erneuert worden, Fotos von ca Mitte 2017)
Kommst du da mal wieder vorbei und kannst nachschauen, ob das Zone 30 oder Spielstraßen sind?

Hallo difoltuser, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
Danke, dass du die Hausnummern eingetragen hast. Nur zur Sicherheit - hast du die vor Ort gesammelt?
Weil du den Bayernatlas erwähnst, den dürfen wir (OSM) nicht für Hausnummern oder Straßennamen hernehmen. Nur die Luftbilder dürfen wir abmalen, die bei iD und JOSM auch eingestellt werden können.
Servus, daganzdaanda

Hallo XXXXXXXXXXXF und willkommen bei OSM!
Danke, dass du die Karte in deiner Gegend pflegst und verbesserst!

Ein Hinweis: In diesem Changeset hast du einige Straßen-Kreuzungen mit "highway=crossing" versehen. Das bedeutet "Fußgängerüberweg" und nicht "Kreuzung", siehe osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway=crossing?uselang=de

Normalerweise wird das an Punkten verwendet, an denen ein offizieller Fußgängerweg die Straße kreuzt, also meistens wo ein Zebrastreifen oder eine Ampel vorhanden ist. "Unmarkierte" Übergänge zwischen Gehweg und Straße kann man auch einzeichnen. Da kommt dann noch crossing=unmarked dran, siehe osm.wiki/DE:Key:crossing

An den Straßenkreuzungen macht das tag so eher wenig Sinn, vielleicht kannst du es irgendwann mal wieder entfernen.

Servus und viel Spaß beim mappen!
daganzdaanda

Another try...
osm.org/changeset/53869084

By the way, your work seems to be better than some of the previous students.
But sometimes you still used things like
addr:housenumber=ks
and
addr:place=a
or
addr:place=(some number)
What do you want to say with this? Maybe we can find a better way to put this into the database.
---
For your information, here is the description of the "addr:*" keys:
osm.wiki/Key:addr

Hello Anh Sơn, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Are you mapping as a part of a university project?
I'm asking because the previous mappers who gave DITAGIS as a source have often used the wrong tags, so that their work was mostly useless. We (the OSM community) could help your professor to give the students better information on what tags should be used. Could you help us get in contact?
Thanks!

FYI, please see also the comments here:osm.org/changeset/51162011#map=18/10.83807/106.77783

Tubk86 has been active for a longer time, and s/he has responded to a changeset comment once, so I tried to ask her/him about the meaning of the tagging and if it's a University project:
osm.org/changeset/53418386

A newly active mapper: osm.org/user/Anh%20Sơn/history#map=13/10.8363/106.7702

If this is a University project (DITAGIS), maybe your professor would like to get into contact with the OSM community? The way things are going at the moment is not very sustainable, and wasting a lot of effort of students and other mappers.

Google says, Ditagis is the "CENTER FOR DEVELOPING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (DITAGIS)" at the Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology: http://www.ditagis.hcmut.edu.vn/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=281&Itemid=134
So this looks like a student project, which might explain why some mappers are active for a short while only.

Hi Tubk86,
you are still adding addr:housenumber=ks and addr:place=a to some nodes. Why? What meaning do these tags have for you?

Hi Nikki Beaudoin, welcome to OpenStreetMap!
.
It seems that you had some trouble with Lake Beseka. (I have repaired the lake, it should re-appear soon.)
.
The lake is mapped as a "relation", which makes it a little bit more complicated than other areas. iD is not the best editor when it comes to large and/or complicated things. If you want to continue with OSM, maybe try JOSM?
.
Look at osm.org/help for ways to get help. OSM is full of nice people who are willing to help (even if Carnildo sounds slightly sarcastic... ;-)

Hi Theamai10, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

It seems that you had some trouble with Lake Beseka. (I have repaired the lake, it should re-appear soon.) The lake is mapped as a "relation", which makes it a little bit more complicated than other areas. iD is not the best editor when it comes to large and/or complicated things. If you want to continue with OSM, maybe try JOSM?
Look at osm.org/help for ways to get help. OSM is full of nice people who are willing to help :)

Hi Tubk86,

I see you are trying to clean up a bit of the messy tagging here. Please note that in order to be useful for anybody, tags should be used as defined in the wiki.

osm.wiki/Addresses
osm.wiki/Key:addr
osm.wiki/Key:information

All addr:housename=a should be deleted, they don't make sense.

addr:place with some number is also very likely wrong. What do you want to express with the numbers in that tag?

Also, information=* has to do with tourism=information only in OSM. If you have any other information that belongs in the database, maybe put it as note=* ( osm.wiki/Key:note )

If you need help cleaning up here, please say so! If these wrong tags are not cleaned up, I fear someone will just delete all the nodes without keeping any address information.

Hi Eirik,
the tag "elevation=*" is available, so you don't need to put the info in the name tag as with Gimshøgda osm.org/node/4892716849
Compare with osm.org/node/4443782832

Hope this helps :-) Happy mapping

Hello Eirik!
I saw that you entered some areas as "buiding=house" here: osm.org/way/502769609
There are small houses visible on bing, but the areas should definitely tagged with something different. What are those areas? If it's a administrative thing, look at boundary=administrative. If it's just a place that has a name, then maybe a place=isolated_dwelling or hamlet or even place=plot would fit?

Btw, do you know the license of the statkart.no imagery you used? I found this: https://www.kartverket.no/en/data/Terms-of-use/ which says "CC BY 4.0", which is *NOT* compatible with OSM, see osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility and https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

OK, the other nodes seem to be correct as far as I can tell by the context of each. Only one is tagged as "monument", which might be wrong.

At this location here, there's also a tree called "Linde" which just shows that where there is one error, there are often more. I'll change this now...

That query is an interesting way to check this! I just noticed the "artist_name" tag on this node and would have tried to look for other objects with artist_names.

Schade, dass auch die tags die eindeutig nicht aus dem BayernAtlas kommen können gelöscht wurden (siehe die Firma hier osm.org/way/195996794/history#map=18/48.43885/10.92982 und im Umkreis)
Aber es ist vermutlich sauberer so...