dankarran's Comments
Changeset | کڈݨ | رائے |
---|---|---|
169366104 | 5 ݙیہاڑے پہلے | No problem - thanks for updating |
169366104 | 6 ݙیہاڑے پہلے | Thanks for the addition. I notice you set this to access=no even though it's shown as a PRoW. Was it just a mistake, or is it temporarily closed? |
165876502 | 3 مہینے پہلے | I've reverted this changeset as it looks like a number of changes have been made inadvertently. I'll follow-up with a quick update to re-instate what appears to be the target of your change: osm.org/node/1207352796/history/2 |
165030070 | 3 مہینے پہلے | I think it may actually be intended to be on the pavement part, as they seem to have added in a new dropped curb now to get off the road and avoid the lights. It feels like it's still a work in progress though. |
164551835 | 4 مہینے پہلے | I got a GPS trace from walking along both pavements and shifted it all W/SW to get it closer to what I saw, but as you say new imagery will be the best bet for getting this more accurate. I'll try to do some Mapillary passes soon for some more detail. |
164551835 | 4 مہینے پہلے | Dock Road still closed off this morning, so I guess it’ll all open overnight tonight. |
164551835 | 4 مہینے پہلے | If you're able to get a GPS trace, it'd be good to check against what we've assumed so far. I have a feeling it should be shifted further to the SW, closer to the DLR. |
164551835 | 4 مہینے پہلے | Good call, yes they're gone now |
164465083 | 4 مہینے پہلے | There's a physical island of some sort being installed today as well |
163755982 | 4 مہینے پہلے | No worries, these things happen. I guess just try to remember to check the warnings in iD when saving ;) |
163755982 | 4 مہینے پہلے | Another one fixed up - osm.org/changeset/163774982 |
163755982 | 4 مہینے پہلے | It looks like you accidentally dragged a node near Royal Victoria - now fixed up in osm.org/changeset/163774765 |
162394948 | 6 مہینے پہلے | Thanks for adding the detail :) |
162099191 | 6 مہینے پہلے | Also, I think this should be left as a highway=track rather than highway=unclassified, as it is primarily for agricultural use rather than general public traffic. It's not a road satnavs should be routing people over. |
162099191 | 6 مہینے پہلے | Welcome to OSM, Pommit, and thanks for sharing local knowledge! I notice you've deleted the beginnings of the Triskelion Way here - osm.org/relation/17932947/history - which I'm guessing was just an accident? I had only added the short part I spotted when I last visited the area, so it was still incomplete. At some point I aim to add the complete route in. Please use caution when using MannGIS for names etc. It's a copyright source, so we shouldn't copy data directly from it. I think it's fine to use to corroborate other sources though, including your own local knowledge. Also, if adding Manx names, it would be great if you could specify it as the Manx name. When you add a name in the editor, if you press the '+' beside it then choose Manx in the field that appears, and enter the name in there as well. Feel free to send a message if I can help with anything! |
161686617 | 6 مہینے پہلے | It hasn't reopened, I passed it today and there are still works ongoing here |
157918485 | 9 مہینے پہلے | No worries - I never remember these sort of details when I'm cycling past :) Good question about the northern footway. I didn't quite catch that detail in the photo I took last night, but I think it's got a cycling prohibition sign. I'll double check next time I'm passing. |
157918485 | 9 مہینے پہلے | The north-south crossing on Connaught Road is definitely still a zebra with parallel cycle crossing, without a proper island and no buttons to control. I wonder if you were thinking of the other new crossing just to the south of the roundabout, with the toucans and an island? |
157918485 | 10 مہینے پہلے | Interesting, maybe they changed their mind after installing it. I'll swing by and check it out again at some point. |
157918485 | 10 مہینے پہلے | They've removed the newly installed zebra crossing? Presumably the remaining crossing shouldn't be foot=no in that case? |