There are some strange looking land use polygons in developed residential and commercial areas that do not follow the straight lines that define these areas on the ground. Lines contain irregular curves that don't correspond to reality and due to the vast excess of points used to define the shapes it is difficult to fix these shapes. Would it be ok to just delete these irregular shapes and just start over? Here's an example that I partially fixed: osm.org/way/886549722/history#map=17/41.813063/-71.369576&layers=N

Weird typing issue in rapid editor. Meant to write "add butcher" as the changeset comment

There's a note claiming that the Paul Murray Wildlife Area doesn't exist. There's little info about this area, what is the source for the name of this area?

added community center

A note appeared today concerning the name of this pond. What was the source of the name?

Changed surface to concrete. Thanks for the information!

Thanks for the quick response! I made some edits to the trail. If you can take a look and see if the trail is correctly mapped, I'd appreciate it.

This changeset added a 2+ mile long bridge to the Bells Mountain Trail. Does this trail have a long boardwalk section or was this an editing error?

There are sidewalks named as South Harvard Avenue East that are adjacent to the road and a sidewalk which are mapped as North Harvard Avenue East. I believe that the problem begins at East Admiral Place and extends north.

The last item in the changeset comment should have been changing park boundary

You may be correct, feel free to add the tourism=artwork tag if you think it is appropriate.

Added artwork_type=graffiti to bridge pier

Storage rental can include parking areas for RV, cars, etc. See documentation: osm.wiki/Tag:shop%3Dstorage_rental

No problem, it was a straightforward edit

Some addresses from this changes were added in a grid pattern. Here's a link to a note which describes this issue. What can be done to fix this?osm.org/note/2902722

As noted in the changeset comment, the address is preserved in another poi (Nute Juice). The closed business was not placed in correct location and the use of lifestyle prefix doesn't seem appropriate here since it would preserve bad data. Doesn't seem to be a good practice to map a closed shop at the wrong location or preserve an address that isn't mapped correctly.

There's a note that has been added recently stating that the feature called "Something Switch" is "Roosevelt Switchpoint". Do you have any idea if this suggestion is correct?

The business closed many years ago and therefore doesn’t seem to meet the criteria for using a lifestyle prefix described in the documentation.

It’s a twin home or duplex

There's a note requesting that the name be removed from this cabin. Is there any reason that the name shouldn't be removed. Link to note: osm.org/note/4246891