I think you were a bit too restrictive with access=private. I know I have been cycling several times from Schlossstrasse/Flurstrasse to Langenthal through the property of Glaströsch and south of the Forest along the train tracks. "private" is about the same as "no". So at least a few of those roads should be "permissive" or maybe even easier just no access tags.

Used wrong account. This has nothing to do with the address import.

We do not include translations in OSM. We only include actually used names. This means big cities usually have a well defined name in many languages, and lots of name tags in OSM. But not small insignificant things.

Sora-0605: N'hésitez pas à le corriger. Ou bien utilise "note": osm.org/note/new#map=14/46.7046/6.7948&layers=N

If you map land use, you do not need to exclude buildings from the land use area. I don't know if you did this intentional or if iD was misbehaving. I fixed it for this land use polygon.

You need to make two rings to map these two clearings. I fixed it for you.

Hi

Why did you remove the bridge tag? Two roads are crossing there without an intersection, so one of them must be either a bridge or a tunnel.

Also, please use meaningful changeset comments. In this changeset you didn't add anything, you changed geometries, and removed the bridge tag. For example write: improved geometry of the green and of the track.

I don't like that these tracks were added back as abandoned. They were properly removed, new layer of asphalt on the road and everything. What is the point of connecting it again with abandoned? You see the remnants of the tracks to the left and right, but not on the streets.

This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 46953740

This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 46953740

This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 46953740

This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 46953740

This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 46953740

This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 46953740

This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 46953740

Looks like you wanted to make notes for you. But you edited the map for everyone. Please do not upload your notes to the map, it will just get deleted

Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. Wohnhäuser haben meist keinen Namen, den kannst du einfach weg lassen (leer lassen)

This changeset has been reverted: osm.org/changeset/46449419 here, because it mechanically re-tagged paths in forests. Please discuss such edits first.

Diese ändrungen wurden revertiert, weil einfach alle path in einem Wald umgetagt wurden. Waldweg ist nicht einfach track.

eagleeye_zh bitte gehe darauf ein was andere Leute aus de community schreiben. Beleidigungen sind nicht angebracht. Du kannst dich im Wiki informieren und bei unklarheiten zum Beispiel auf der mailingliste http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo nachfragen.
Grüsse
Michael

Ja Hamlet ist ok. Ich hatte das eine Stufe höher getagt weil Wart und Sankt Wolfgang so prominent angeschrieben sind mit den Ortseingangstafeln. Ist aber schon gut so.
Du kannst natürlich ein place=farm als Fläche tagen. Ist aber nicht zwingend.
Schau mal osm.wiki/Key:place dort ist es recht übersichtlich aufgelistet.
Danke und Grüsse
Michael

Du hast das zu highway=track geaendert, was für Land und Forstwirtschaft ist. Für zweispurige Fahrzeuge hauptsächlich. Highway=path ist recht allgemein, nicht nur für die aller schmalsten Wege. Was du mit Velowegen und Gehwegen meinst, ist mir nicht klar.
Jedenfalls solch grossflächiges umtagen ist nicht ok. Frag zuerst auf der Schweizer Mailingliste nach.