OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Diskusija

Komentar wot Minh Nguyen spisany dnja 23. May 2009 09:51

Perhaps you could try adding note=Yahoo! is out of date here. or something like that.

Komentar wot c2r spisany dnja 23. May 2009 10:36

Have you let the users know? h in potlatch to find who did it!

Komentar wot RichardB spisany dnja 23. May 2009 11:47

I guess you'd have to be blind to change it back again now! But there must be plenty of places where Yahoo is now out of date. I can think of several. In addition, I can also think of areas where GPX traces are now out of date.

Some way of removing out of date GPX points would be good. Could be tricky to implement though.

Komentar wot RichardB spisany dnja 23. May 2009 11:50

I've also noticed that your junction has a set of unconnected nodes at the northernmost highway=traffic_signals node. Can I assume that these should be merged?

Komentar wot daveemtb spisany dnja 23. May 2009 12:44

I had put an explanatory note on all the nodes the first time I mapped it correctly! Hence the rather silly writing all over it now!

I think the uncorrected nodes were an error in Potlatch when I reverted the ways. They need deleting.

Komentar wot Andrew Chadwick spisany dnja 26. May 2009 15:30

Perhaps it would be cleaner to draw a small bounding box with a note explaining that Yahoo!'s imagery is out-of-date here. Much like osm.org/browse/way/32737099 only in reverse...

Komentar wot daveemtb spisany dnja 26. May 2009 18:31

I'm sure it would be neater, but people weren't reading the annotations on the nodes of the junction. I'll clean it up eventually, but thought more unmissable "hint" would be useful effective the short term to discourage reversion.

Komentar wot daveemtb spisany dnja 26. May 2009 18:32

I should add that my initial exasperated diary post was not a complaint at anyone who does Yahoo tracing - I do quite a lot myself. It's just important that people don't assume it's right and the existing mapping is wrong.

Přizjewić, zo by komentar spisał(a)