thanks for quick response.
I see that you removed indoor tag, but looks like those roads should still be into the building polygon, because I don't see any of them on the satellite and they have different levels and steps between levels. Looks like these roads just accidentally got outside the building and needs just put in back accordingly original scheme.
Thank you.

Hi Gangadi Anusha!
I see that some indoor ways from your changeset are outside building polygon. Could you please re-check and fix this?
Thank you.

Hi Alex! We received the feedback about this relation. Based on it the campus should have the name -Scarborough TEC College, because the University of Hull is moved to another location about 6 years ago. But I see that you changed the name back in the last year. And now there is some discrepancy between this node amenity (osm.org/node/5038677297#map=19/54.26209/-0.39373) and this way amenity (osm.org/way/281701030#map=18/54.26211/-0.39383), that also is part of the relation (osm.org/relation/16193556)
Looks like you have local knowledge there, so could you please confirm the real situation?

Hi, thank you for this explanation

Welcome.
I modified this relation.

The engine supported both versions and according to the wiki it may be in both too "The British spelling manoeuvre=* is preferred, but OSRM also supports the American spelling maneuver=*".
I can change tagging for this relation, if it preferable for this region.
Thanks

Hi, thanks for this question. Yes, such edits documented here (osm.wiki/Relation:manoeuvre) and may use on complex/discuss intersections for routing.

Hi,
probably, received driver feedback that these roads already completed

Hi!
They doesn't looks like classical alleys. There is access to buildings by w113581376. w113581372 - controversial, it looks as backyard, more then others

It looks like entrance to underground parking. The oneway road salready were mapped, I only added for the end/start points the tag amenity=parking_entrance, because oneway road couldn't start or finish without outlet

Hello,
I just solved oneway error and didn't change access for the parking.

Thanks

Many thanks

Hi,
Thanks for info!

Many thanks

Hi All,

Thanks for info!

I've multiple driver's feedbacks that confirms this road using for access to farms/buildings from north (osm.org/way/827266287/history#map=19/52.79730/-2.60171, osm.org/way/827266286/history and etc.) and south (osm.org/way/827266288/history).

But now, I agree that this road unroutable for motor_vehicles in middle part and is more as service then unclassified (but not track from north)

Thanks, Ilya

Hi, thanks for clarification.

My mistake, just overwork with driveways)

FIxed.

Thanks

Hi ndm!

ESRI (Clarity) is 2011, on the 2018 ESRI World, most of the cars are headed southbound, and this partially confirms our edit.

Plus it is worth explaining, that we made our edits based only on OSM sources, and customer feedback just helps us to locate the problem and chose the best way to solve it. In the last 3 months, we had multiple (7) feedbacks from drivers, confirming that you can't drive northbound on Abingdon Road between Moorlands and Honiton road, so we made our edit based on this information.

As I can see, you are very active in Bristol, maybe you are local? If so, it will be useful for all OSM contributors if you do some local survey some time.

I agree that there is a tiny chance that something changed here or we made a mistake, but we are doing our best to be sure that none of our OSM contributions do any harm to the data.

Thanks for reaching out, feel free to ask questions!

Because this footpath have tag access=yes, in navigation engines it means that footpath is routable for motor vehicles. for solution needs add motor_vehicle=no or remove the access=yes

Many thanks for info

No, this one is the only edit.
In this case only u-turn is restricted. Is it right?