Cheers. I've split it at the Sittingbourne Road, please take a look and make further changes as you see fit

Yes that's correct - they put the trainees next door to the adepts. There are two separate shop fronts and entrances, so I don't think it would be correct to put them in a subsidiary relationship.

Maybe the academy should have training tags? I'll add them.

Hi Robert, thanks for checking up on this. "Headmasters Academy" is an adjacent venue where they let apprentices test their skills on the public (usually at a reduced rate). I've removed the erroneous William Hill tags.

Yes, they're local names used by runners and walkers - maybe alt_name would be appropriate. My understanding is that they're artificial, formed from spoil from the construction of the A3 over the course of the Portsmouth Road, in particular from the excavation of the Tibbet's Corner underpass, so they probably date to the 1920s.

Sorry about that, thanks for fixing. Ed

oui ça devrait être power=pole, je l'ai corrigé

I go through there fairly regularly, but maybe my memory is faulty. I'll mark it demolished so no-one else makes the same mistake.

Sure!

> Could you clarify the purpose of your edit to Green Park?

Correct the eastern boundary - it is a more or less straight fence, not the complicated shape that was there before. I figured that was probably the shape of the adjacent gardens, so I split that into ways 863554955 and 156867476.

> What happened to its original polygon way?

Converted to a multipolygon - this is what iD does when you split a polygon way.

> Why have you made it a MP with only one member?

See above. If you want to convert it back to a single polygon feel free - I don't think it's possible in iD, or at least I don't know how. It's complicated by the grass relation 7578325 sharing the outer way, so if you could fix that at the same time that'd be great.

> Why is there a MP of all the trees?

No idea, it was like that when I got here.

Ah, I see the difference, thanks. I think quite a few of these are "cushion" or "table", so I'll use those as well in the wider area.

offset 3.43,-1.03

Yes, that's annoying. I'll just need to get in the habit of setting offset when I start editing. Thanks!

Hi! Yes, I'd be very happy to use the same alignment as you're using - it sounds like you've actually put some thought into it. Do you have numerical coordinates to offset the new Bing imagery in the Coombe area or can you give me instructions how to find them? I'm using iD to edit.

It's the eastern stage of the Fulham Riverside development. Should definitely reopen once that's completed.

According to https://www.reddit.com/r/londoncycling/comments/cdyu89/the_closed_section_of_the_greenway_beside_olympic/ the Greenway from Stratford High Street to Marshgate Lane and the path alongside the Waterworks River to Sidings Street are now open? Are you in the area to check?

Done, thanks. Looks like a typo in the OS.

Hi, you broke this node osm.org/node/963509435 by moving it into a railway. I guess this was probably by accident when trying to drag the map? Please could you check whether you have made similar errors elsewhere?

Removed spurious tags in osm.org/changeset/59020549 . Reviewing other edits by osm.org/user/FrenchSuit/history

Yes, please do - don't know how I got the idea that they had put traffic lights in.

Thanks for spotting that! It's just a dry cleaners' now. I've fixed it in osm.org/changeset/56933362

Hi, this left Departures Road incomplete. I restored the missing section in osm.org/changeset/56487904 - please check.