OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
147279800 over 1 year ago

Hi, is the name of this actually suffixed with -National Trust? It's already in the operator tag (albeit misspelled).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147279800

147199186 over 1 year ago

It's not possible afterwards, but having it in here is the closest you'd get, thanks for clarifying.

147199186 over 1 year ago

Hi Jack, is there anything on that site indicating that the content is public domain? If not, it's copywrited and we'd need to use another source or map on the ground to add this in.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147199186

147108714 over 1 year ago

Hi, can you provide any further details on this change? You've done one that spans two continents with no description of what you've actually changed.

147152887 over 1 year ago

Hi there, this seems like a mechanical edit that has changed two nodes labelled "Verso Books", despite the Wikipedia and WikiData entries only applying to one of those. Please don't perform mechanical edits like this without discussing first, or if it's small like this, manually check each change before submitting. I've reverted the change to osm.org/node/7738540146 since it's incorrect.

146979571 over 1 year ago

There's a few houses near Peerless/Stebonheath Road in Munno Para West that have some bits that aren't 90 degrees and didn't look like it matched up with imagery.

146812203 over 1 year ago

Hi Melan839, even community groups are potentially subject to the Organised editing rules/guidelines.

147042978 over 1 year ago

Hi, addr:housenumber shouldn't be used for the unit numbers, you've also removed the house and street numbers. I'd give osm.wiki/Key:addr:* a read for more info on adding addresses, but for now I'm going to revert this since it's removed data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147042978

147030832 over 1 year ago

Thanks for catching that one for me!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147030832

147005374 over 1 year ago

Hey, it would be best to just map the whole parking area as amenity=parking. Also, the section near the north west part of the building isn't really parking.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/147005374

146979571 over 1 year ago

Whoops, thanks for catching the typo!

146979571 over 1 year ago

Hey there, pressing W in both of and JOSM will square off buildings, it’s a good idea to do this where possible.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146979571

146812203 over 1 year ago

Which users is this from? Are they giving you the information under the expectation that it's public domain or provided under a license that allows for it's use here?

You should make sure that the actual source is documented in your changeset, all you have listed is Bing Maps Aerial from iD automatically adding it.

I'd also recommend smaller, more local changesets as well, instead of one covering 4 continents.

146812203 over 1 year ago

Hi, what is the source for this addition of ATMs across multiple continents?

146732596 over 1 year ago

Hi, highways/roads (including service roads) shouldn't be mapped separately unless there's a physical separation. I don't see why there would have been issues with how it was previously mapped, and adding access=private may potentially cause more issues for routing, since it implies permission is required before going on that highway/road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146732596

146732068 over 1 year ago

Hi, you've added the gate tags both to a node and a way, they should only exist on one of them. You also probably don't need some of the tags, especially things like opening_hours.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146732068

146732302 over 1 year ago

Hey, oneway shouldn't be set on here if there's no other way to get out, this would break routing further.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146732302

146575976 over 1 year ago

I've reverted this changeset since everything indicated these were just removed to remove "clutter" in a specific rendering of OSM.

osm.org/changeset/146693149

146558606 over 1 year ago

I was just pointing out how CC-BY alone isn't enough for OSM and how we require the waiver.

146558606 over 1 year ago

The license on their website ic CC-BY 4.0, which means attribution is required. We can't provide that directly so we need a waiver (like we have for DataSA) that states attribution through the Wiki is acceptable instead of direct attribution where we use the data.