Hi, for mobile phone numbers, the 4 from the area code should be grouped with the next two numbers (+61 466 770 588 in this case) to match the formatting used by the phone key.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165574677

Hi there, the AIP-ERSA documents are copyrighted, we can't use them as a data source.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165535044

Thanks for catching that one!

Hi,

Andrew from the Data Working Group here.

Can you please let me know the reason for these mass removals, considering that these buildings do exist in the imagery your edit lists you as using?

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

(translated using libretranslate.com)

Привет.

Эндрю из Рабочей группы по данным.

Можете ли вы сообщить мне причину этих массовых перемещений, учитывая, что эти здания существуют в изображениях, которые вы используете?

Привет,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

There's also a set of overlapping buildings, looks like it might have been an attempt at using one of the building plugins that didn't quite work as intended.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165494943

Hi OmerMadlan,

You'll need to read through the guidelines linked previously for information on this, if you don't understand those guidelines you'll need to refrain from editing on behalf of your organisation.

Apologies for the lack of translation as I'm currently out and about.

I'm just about to update it to shop=printing, seems the most appropriate to me.

Hi OmerMadlan,

Thanks for your response, can you please reply here with a link once the Wiki page has been created?

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

(translated with libretranslate.com)

Hi OmerMadlan,

תודה על התגובה שלך, תוכל בבקשה לענות כאן עם קישור ברגע שנוצר דף ויקי?

המונחים:,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

Hi OmerMadlan,

Andrew from the Data Working Group here.

Can you please confirm if you are editing on behalf of an organisation, as you will need to ensure you are following the Organised Editing Guidelines [1] if that is the case.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

(translated with libretranslate.com)

Hi OmerMadlan,

אנדרו מקבוצת העבודה של הנתונים כאן.

אתה יכול בבקשה לאשר אם אתה עורך מטעם הארגון, כפי שאתה צריך כדי להבטיח שאתה עוקב אחר הוראות עריכה מאורגנת [1] אם זה המקרה.

המונחים:
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group

[1] osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Guidelines

If you were to go with the argument of it being a crossover because it's neither Jones or Gladstone Road, then trunk_link would be what you'd want for a crossover between the two sides of a trunk.

It's not suddenly a significantly more capable road for that small crossover, it's not part of the Princes Highway, and shoudn't be tagged based off of it.

For naming it, you can just go with noname=yes to indicate that section doesn't actually have a name.

If one were different, I'd say dealer's choice, but personally would go with the higher of the two. Putting it as the same as the road it's crossing just doesn't make sense to me.

Hey, you've added addr:housenumber as "a" here, was that intentional?

Not sure whether the road way is wrong or the Liberty is wrong, but the street names don't match up, Claire vs Clare. Do you know which one is correct?

Hi, you changed the address of node/12417453546 to 9 Twynam Road, was this a mistake? The node is a couple of streets over on Coil Way
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165315769

Hi there, those guidelines are just recommendations, not hard guidelines. Changing this to tertiary while keeping the northern part as secondary is quite odd as well.

If it definitely meets the critera for a tertiary road more than a secondary road (excluding what WA Mainroads says), that's fine, but I'd recommend also updating the section immediately north of this one.

Should way/32805950 and way/998301746 be highway=trunk? I would have thought it would be secondary since both Gladstone Road and Jones Road are highway=secondary.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165313043

Hi, this line isn't a road, it's part of an administrative boundary border. I've removed the tags from it, you'll want to add those tags to the ways for the roads themselves.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165307626

Hey Mateusz! It is a clothing screen printer, I wasn't too sure what it specifically was and that's the tag Every Door adds in that scenario and I was going to come back to it today but didn't get a chance. Don't think shop=clothes would really match, it's not somewhere you can just go in and walk out with a shirt, but there is a physical presence you could go in and see them and collect orders.

Happy for any recommendations, otherwise I'll dig around the wiki and TagInfo when I have a moment.

Hi, you accidentally moved the Oporto node here, plus there's no changes to Metro Parade in this changeset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165170896

Hi,

Andrew from the Data Working Group here,

Can you please explain these edits, as they appear to just be adding random nodes with no description?

If there's no explanation, these and your other changes may be reverted.

Kind regards,
Andrew Welch, OSMF Data Working Group