Mapping it as it exists is the best way to do that, which would probably be to keep the ways there, but tag them to reflect that it's not actually part of Frenchmens Road and that it's private.

You'd have to ask whoever mapped it as such, if you check the history of that item, you'll be able to see that changeset, and you can comment on it.

For private property, you'd tag it as access=private.
Driveways get mapped as people choose to, someone most likely was mapping the area and saw it on aerial imagery and drew it in.

I'm part of the Data Working Group as a volunteer moderator, however I commented on this outside of that role.

There's a note on the highway=residential section that does mention that it differs from the road reserve in the DCS NSW base map, however what's there is what's been mapped. YOu've also removed a driveway that does exist from the looks of aerial imagery, and should still remain, but be marked as access=private.

Hi, if this is actually private property, the ways should remain and be tagged as such. You've removed a segment and left another part named Frenchmens Road disconnected from other roadways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165008766

Hi, can you explain the length meter and Point_Fid tags you're adding to these ways, as well as all the nodes you've deleted?

This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 164997178, 165004309, 165005104, 165005175, 165005299, 165005788.

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 165008686 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert - fictional game editing

Google isn't a source we can use, it's copyrighted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164793552

Hi, a lack of a footpath doesn't inherently mean pedestrians aren't allowed there. If there's no signage, then foot=no should be removed.

I've reverted it back to version 7, however I'd recommend restoring any tags you've removed that are still valid, and double checking that your sources are correct before making changes.

You also should have reverted it back to the state it was previously in when you found out your edit was incorrect.

Hi,

Please don't delete data that is still valid, this changeset was completely incorrect if that area is not just grass. If you're going to make changes, make them straight away, there was a significant delay before this "grass" area was changed, and it still lacks significant detail compared to its previous state.

Please also don't remove valid names from OpenStreetMap.

Hi there,

You've got a highway=track crossing a barrier=fence, is there a gate there or something that could be mapped to show that it's possible to go through?

Also, can you please be a bit more descriptive than "added stuff" in your changeset comments, it's good to explain at a basic level what your changeset does.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi there, can you please add a comment to your changesets describing what you're doing in them.

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi, the changeset comment should be used to describe what your changeset is doing, not the source.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164806652

Most of that way has parking along it, and the parts that aren't I wouldn't really class as an alley, wouldn't they be better just left as a generic service road
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164799948