Not a problem!

I've changed it to segregated=no as there's no visible segregation between walking and cycling users that I can see on aerial imagery or from past walking in that area, please let me know and correct me if it has recently changed though.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155632453

Hi, the way you've changed isn't a road, it's a way used as part of administrative boundaries.

Reverted changeset to restore service=alley tags

osm.org/changeset/155717925

Not a problem, the wiki is a great place to check out different tags, osm.wiki/Tag:service=alley covers this one.

Hi, service=alley just indicates the type of service road they are, from the looks of aerial imagery, these would all likely be considered alleys.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155698004

I've reverted this, there isn't a second road showing in aerial imagery

osm.org/changeset/155674712

Hi, is there a reason why you've changed this cycleway to an unclassified road in a changeset named test? This is not a test environment.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155673716

All good! Just wanted to check since the building only had a house number before.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155635636

Hi, is the whole building Unit 4?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155635636

Hey, is way 1308275843 actually segregated? I don't think there's separation between walking and cycling along there
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155632453

Thanks for catching and fixing my typo!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155577728

Do these two trails meet up at the end, or are there two separate trails that run side by side in close proximity?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155226119

Hey, these aren't parks, they should be tagged as sports pitches, and drawn more accurately
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154999689

I'm not sure is sports centre is the best tag for this, I'd probably take tourism=Sports out, but landuse=recreation_ground is either more appropriate, or should be replaced by something else, since it's closer to a park that contains several facilities, some being sports.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154658202

If you keep social_facility, that is

social_facility=office isn't very common, is there possibly a better value under office= that could work for this?
They also cover disability support, so social_facility:for=senior;disability would be best I'd say
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/154039755

I reckon the garden centre bit on their website is more along the lines of "we have a gardening and plants area", even though there isn't a huge amount compared to other stores.

Hey, good work on updating these, I've been meaning to do some work on some of these!

Couple of questions, is Stratco really a garden centre, DIY would suit it better I would have thought, especially the Gawler/Willaston store.
And I don't think the fresha.com link is really right for the website tag, maybe website:booking is more appropriate, what do you think?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153999575

Hi, do we have permission to use that information? According to the document itself, it's under copyright so we'd need explicit permission to use it in OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153776297