Hi, just wondering what your source for this change is, as there isn't one mentioned?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162718448

Hey there, sometimes the Microsoft Building Footprints dataset isn't all that accurate, it's a good idea once you've added some buildings with it to make sure it matches up to aerial imagery, as some of these aren't quite aligned properly.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162475212

Yeah that would probably be fine, best way to put that down would be to put your source as survey.

Publicly provided information may still be copywrited, which we can't use.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162309715

Hi, do you know if that document is provided under an acceptible license for OSM to use?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162309715

Putting amenity=training in that multipolygon both won't change rendering, and is incorrect data, so it should be removed. Both schools do show on the map currently, if they have distinct areas then you could map them as ways, but if there's shared section of campus, the best way is likely going to be leaving the schools as nodes, or seeing if there's a way to represent it with some kind of relation per school, if an option exists.

Hi Hairy Spoon, if there's multiple schools in this one landuse, I'd just remove the amenity tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162188738

Thanks! Sometimes OSM tagging doesn't quite fit in with what we call things, especially in Australia.

Hey, same as changeset 160655807, this would be better tagged as leisure=park, not leisure=nature_reserve
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160632654

Hey there, leisure=park is probably more fitting, what we call a reserve in AU isn't a leisure=nature_reserve, and a park in OSM doesn't necessarily have to be a proper one managed by council.

osm.wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160655807

Reverting changeset to remove mistakenly added restriction

osm.org/changeset/160529458

You definitely can turn right there, the bridge is represented as two ways in OSM, one for each direction. I'll remove the restriction since you definitely can turn there in that case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160519985

Hi, this blocks right hand turns from the eastern side of Torrens Road to South Road, has something changed recently where this isn't allowed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160519985

If they're definitely not Transperth stops (and you can confirm that somehow) then I'd remove the tags that reference Transperth but that's it. It's entirely possible that there is bus stops there still, just not Transperth ones.

Hi, you've removed all tags from these stops but kept the nodes there. If these stops exist then only the Transperth details should be removed. If the stops don't exist at all anymore the nodes should be deleted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160236132

Hi there and welcome to OSM! The only feedback I can give is that the name should be something that is signposted in person, is "elizabeth backway footpath" signed for this? If not, that should be removed, but everything else looks good on here from a quick look.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160160134

Hey and welcome to OSM! One tip, buildings usually are square and while drawing that perfectly can be difficult, iD (and JOSM) both have a shortcut to square off buildings, just select it and hit the Q button, then double check to make sure it's all still matching up. Have fun mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159796772

Some of these also don't appear to actually be at the junctions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159681615

Some of these also don't appear to actually be at the junctions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159681615

Hi, just wondering what street level imagery you used to confirm this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/159111184