Nice. There should be _some_ mapillary imagery around there, but it’s a few years old now.

heya, on way 586667398 you've marked it all as a bridge. Was this a mistake? I've not been there for some time but I recall it being on a hill with a very small bridge just at the field boundary.

Hi nickbooker,
Regarding the signage at the northernmost edge: I've always interpreted as indicating the status of the parallel shared use path on the southern side of Technology drive. The blue signage by the bridge is referring to the viaduct cycleway that heads northwest once over the railway. It curiously does not offer any directions at the base of the northern end of the rail bridge that head north towards technology drive despite the amount of points of interest in that direction. https://api.warwickshire.gov.uk/documents/WCCC-930-120 is rather dated, but does mark this stretch as no cycling - however when that was published, the route still had stairs down from the railbridge!
The practical reality is very different. It is frequently used by cycles up to the canal.
Legally the bridge would be suitable to mark as a shared use path with the evidence seen, however there's gaps in evidence for the rest of the black path except the number of cyclists using it!
As a regular user of this path this might encourage me to pester the council to clarify its status. :)

Hi nickbooker! The black path is definitely shared use in practice. It isn't recorded on the area's definitive maps as a PROW of any kind though, and it used to be a key route through the GEC industrial estate. With that said, when they've done maintenance work on the path, Warks council have signed diversionary routes as if it is a highway. It also is marked as F.P. in OS maps from the early 1900s: https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/side-by-side/#zoom=17&lat=52.38241&lon=-1.25750&layers=6&right=osm

Looks good, thanks for contributing :)

Looks like it's to the north of the area you mapped to me.. 52.42272/-1.21109

I was *just* thinking I needed to add the Derry Ormond Tower and by chance you did! thanks

Agreed, was only adding the foot=yes tag, though it’s a bigger job than a mobile app can manage

Heya, You've made a lot of edits since joining. If you're tracing aerial imagery, be aware that the Maxtar imagery is generally quite a bit newer than the bing aerial imagery around the country.

Oops, thanks for fixing !

Hi Zafica, the pokestops and ingress portals are not stored in Osm, but are (currently) suggested and nominated by higher level ingress users. This is already a ‘portal’ in ingress. I dunno why some portals have become pokestops and others have not. The band stand building is already mapped - although not not named. I’m going to add the name to the structure mapped and remove the node you added. Please don’t be discouraged to add new map data in general. When the map gets re-rendered in game, it will include a lot of extra info compared to what is currently displayed, but won’t affect pokestops/gym creation.

Caldecott? I meant projects drive estate.

Cheers!

The Shobnall Fields park was tagged as level 0 and layer -1. That may have resulted in weird routing? I've removed those attributes now as I'm reasonably confident this isn't underground, or another land use.

The Mill Bank Mews bus stop on this change set is in a weird place on Kenilworth common. Is that right?

D’oh! Thanks for fixing my typo.

Ah, cheers for correcting that, I was stumped as to why it wasn’t rendering the way I thought it should.