ugh we clashed again, this time i saved before yours but no conflicts as I didn't delete any nodes...

should it be yes @ (05:00-22:00) ? will add in meantime

Hi, just wanted to let you know I fixed a node you accidentally dragged to an improper location, just be careful when scrolling around in the map when editing. No further action needed. New location of the node is osm.org/node/10303495305 .

I was indeed very hesitant to change this road because I was not sure of the actual road name ad tried to contact the initial author of the road (through the other changeset) since he appeared to be local and knew about it. Oh well, I do have an OSM note on the area so someone local or perhaps privileged to the data could fix it for certain,but as of now this might be a mistake.

Hi, I made a comment in osm.org/changeset/127859021 about the previous editor to this road here but now I have some questions about this change. Seems you just deleted the overlapping road, but is this east-west road really called victorville drive or is it prismo lane?

Hi, it looks like you accidentally moved osm.org/node/595490659 and made a mess of the highway... if you could fix it in the next few days that would be great.

Hi, just wanted to let you know, these cul-de-sacs at the end of residential roads are not roundabouts and shouldn't be marked as such. This isn't so much of a problem as when the roundabout was marked as such, the default oneway direction is the direction of the way, and it's wrong now for drive-on-right areas... Let me know if know if you this doesn't make sense or if you need me to fix it. Thanks!

Hi, thanks for your contribution. I unfortunately had to end up deleting a good portion of the footpath you added as it overlapped an existing road - roads are acceptable to walk on by default so you don't need to explicitly mark a footpath on that road. You could also explicitly tag that pedestrians are okay on the road, or you could create a hiking path relation. Let me know if you want more details.

For my needs I find this to be a serious violation, curious what the policy on fixes/reverts should be on things like this? Would be nice to make sure this doesn't happen again, even if it's pretty easy to do accidentally especially in iD if one has a slow machine. In fact I wish the iD developers speed up scroll performance to help prevent things like this...

I spotted a mistake in this changeset, and who knows how many more. osm.org/node/8234272754 was dragged to an improper spot. I was about to fix it but this is a systemic problem.

No problem, it happens. TheDutchMan13 osm.org/note/3439389 ended up fixing it!

I went ahead and fixed these issues. Please be careful next time.

just wanted to let you know I ended up cleaning up this changeset to clear up the warning.

Hello, I've been looking for drawings of roadways on top of roadways and noticed Bebe's walk. These drawings that overlap causes confusion when asking a computer to route through these drawing errors. Could this route be represented some other way like a bike path relation, else this route will need to be deleted where it overlaps roads?

Oh, it looks like node osm.org/node/177288693 got disturbed as well, same deal or let me know if you need help!

Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contributions!

However I'd like to point out that there were some errors that were introduced in your changes. I had noted that you moved two nodes at osm.org/node/8810347422 and osm.org/node/5561445353 that would route cars in the wrong direction, please be more careful when clicking and dragging especially on slow machines! If you could fix these it'd be great else please let me know if you'd like for someone else to fix it if you're not sure. Thanks for reading!

Hi, I think you accidentally disturbed the layout of West Fairmount Drive osm.org/way/251611950 - is it now like this on the ground instead of what it looks like in imagery?

It might not be that inconsistent... The whole area is under amenity=university, but not sure if it's best to have Newsom Hall be building=university - though it is a CSU building, it's a residence hall versus something like a lecture hall, so not sure whether the distinction matters. Perhaps it could be building=residential too...

Hi, welcome and thanks for adding new roads!
I've been looking at routing errors and noticed that the new road drawn at osm.org/way/1105658502 overlaps osm.org/way/766818209 and it's not clear to me which one I'd be driving on if I were driving east to west. It's probably Prismo Lane, but if you know which for sure, it'd be great if you could update this, thanks!

Hi, looks like you may have accidentally dragged node osm.org/node/7537269384 out to an improper spot, could you fix this? Thanks!