gpserror's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
156417952 | 11 months ago | ... and hit submit before finishing the changeset comment. but anyway also changed a few service roads to driveways for indivduals, marked some roads as unpaved where visible in sat imagery, and straightened a few roads |
151511557 | 11 months ago | I noticed you added protected bike lanes. However the main street has bike tagging - since you added the bike lanes, the street tagging now needs to have bicycle access removed. Is this what you want? |
155533729 | 11 months ago | Access=no is clearly incorrect as well, these paths you are editing are indeed used for walking from hole to hole as well as for golf carts. You're making the map solely for your use instead of making the map available for everyone's use and this is problematic. |
155533729 | 11 months ago | Yes private driveways should be marked. Anything seen in life or satellite imagery gets drawn. |
155533729 | 11 months ago | Agree with above, they should not be deleted, thank you woodpeck for reverting. I am curious as to what your use model that would require these paths be omitted? Perhaps it's best to change your software to simply avoid walking paths that cross over golf courses much like crossing over military bases, private industries, etc. which are likewise marked on the map? Please do let us know and maybe we can think of a solution that would help you. |
152181557 | 12 months ago | Was the JoDean's building demolished? For shops that aren't actively open and selling, they shouldn't be added or at least a construction:amenity should be used. Also if the name of a shop is unknown, it's better to leave them blank. These are both suggestions as they make searching easier. |
154627454 | 12 months ago | very well, it shall go poof. |
154627454 | 12 months ago | moge subsequently closed in the 10 months you had the note open? |
154080861 | about 1 year ago | What is the brand of the convenience store, this still hasn't been answered. Also the relation relation for it makes no sense, the transit station relation is for the building and not for station. |
153796216 | about 1 year ago | Are these already built and on the ground? Please be aware that your edits are visible by everyone in the world! |
153571145 | about 1 year ago | BTW, if interested or for fun, search for Hygiene, Colorado - that's how I'd expect an unincorporated area gets mapped since there's no real boundary that tells who needs to pay taxes or not. They even have a fire department and a post office... |
153571145 | about 1 year ago | It was indeed someone else but brought up a very good point. I'm not familiar with California unincorporated areas but things but most of the unincorporated pseudo-cities Colorado don't have administrative boundaries since they were always ad-hoc. It's weird that California Park had a boundary which implies there is some government but if it's arbitrarily added to if some land owner says so, then there's really no boundary... |
153571145 | about 1 year ago | Cool, just wanted to verify since the anonymous user did bring up a point:
|
153571145 | about 1 year ago | Could you respond to osm.org/note/4320005 - is there a better way to tag this? |
152462783 | about 1 year ago | osm.org/node/11967069540 as well, though it does have the south college avenue number correct... not sure where/how the 14a applies... they have their unique address already and the subunits have a 100- number... |
152462783 | about 1 year ago | About osm.org/node/11967069541 -- where did this data come from, I think this is obsolete since the rebuilding of this area? |
152937570 | about 1 year ago | Fair enough, just wanted to make sure someone didn't add a new restaurant but the old one was still there, as much as I dislike two restaurants sharing the same cash register... but they are both the same parent company franchiser... |
152937570 | about 1 year ago | Are these all really closed? I spot checked
|
152344045 | about 1 year ago | I also have my doubts that this is a fence. Fences are usually straight and either follow property lines or natural features and this is neither - however it does track something that's being walked upon so that this is some sort of trail at least for part of the way. Clarification is needed. |
152064592 | about 1 year ago | Hey, you deleted Fort Collins. Reverting. |