OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
39980609 almost 4 years ago

Cool, thanks for the fix!

39980609 almost 4 years ago

Hi, I know this changeset is quite a while ago, and you may not remember what's out here, but was looking at the overlap of Willow St and Hemlock Ave going north-south. Do you happen to know which is correct as both appear to be different than TIGER2020?

109959799 almost 4 years ago

Hi, was S. Bofer Canyon Rd closed temporarily for repairs or is it permanent?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109959799

109175968 almost 4 years ago

Actually if you look at 970535068, east monroe actually has a bike lane plotted on the shoulder of the road. I think in general bicyclists should be using the road wherever possible in CO.

Also as drawn, if the sidewalks simply end without connecting to another way, then it won't be used for routing anyway and it's not a particularly useful drawing... At least hook it up to the next road where it appears to do so (i.e. no grass gap).

109423521 almost 4 years ago

Oh... btw, I figured out how to move it efficiently sorta... Don't worry about it anymore, It's fixed now :)

osm.org/node/5954688815

109423521 almost 4 years ago

Looks like the new location is tagged but the POI longitude/latitude needs to be changed... Just a reminder that the tagging doesn't move the POI.

108646574 almost 4 years ago

Cool, I couldn't make heads or tails from the Esri imagery so I figured you may know more about what's here at this location. I just noticed with the validation tools that the circle wasn't completely marked with junction=roundabout and it seems the incoming road had right of way as you say, so this didn't quite fit.

Thanks for resolving.

108646574 almost 4 years ago

Hello, unfortunately I'm not local and don't see imagery so I can't make heads or tails from this, but the current geometries do not seem to match what I'd call a normal osm.wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout - so I would refrain from using this tag in this situation - at least based on what's currently drawn.

108978059 almost 4 years ago

Yeah this is a quite subtle issue that's easy to accidentally overlook. Thanks for looking into all the osmose errors, not enough people are checking them!

(I've been running mkgmap for Garmins and this has been an orthogonal tool to pick up errors, and that's how I found these potential issues.)

108978059 almost 4 years ago

Here's the list (ways) of the roundabouts that currently appear to be rotating clockwise now which isn't typical in the USA. Again I fixed a few already, and let me know if you need help with locating/fixing them.

411132956
462661947
685014281
774900538
892522687
892522689
892522700
892522701

108978059 almost 4 years ago

Actually I did not fix all of them yet, there's more than I thought. Please check the ones you did, I'll hold off fixing them for now.

108978059 almost 4 years ago

hey, just a word of warning - some of the roundabouts had oneway = -1 because they were drawn wrong. Not sure if I fixed all of them but I did fix a couple - however you might want to doublecheck roundabouts are still oneway counterclockwise in the USA after removing one-way tags.

93689318 about 4 years ago

Thanks, I fixed up the rest of relation 4780282 so good to go on my front!

78054874 about 4 years ago

Hello, I noted you created turn restrictions here and then "deleted" them by removing just the 'via' member. For completeness the whole relation should be removed, including the remaining members (from, to; which are necessary to remove the relations). Let me know if you need more details on what I mean.

93689318 about 4 years ago

Spotted this issue osm.org/relation/4780282 while inspecting errors from another tool, marking as a dependency. No U-turn restricion at osm.org/node/55962287 was lost

103113315 about 4 years ago

I did some tweaking to the TRs in changeset # 108658041 - those TRs detailed above were incomplete, they were missing members.

Should be good now I think, though might still get angle warnings.

103113315 about 4 years ago

and I meant to write osm.org/relation/10138282

103113315 about 4 years ago

Actually 12594073 is fine

103113315 about 4 years ago

BTW: these are the broken TR's:
osm.org/relation/12594073
osm.org/relation/10138281
osm.org/relation/10138284

103113315 about 4 years ago

Oh don't worry too much about "OSMCha" -it's just a tool to view changes, I just happened to be looking at the change in this tool. Anyway the turn restrictions got broken when the link was taken out, if you could fix them, great; if not, let me know and I can clean them up.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103113315