grouper's Comments
Changeset | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
105642299 | about 4 years ago | WTF Bro - Everything you added is fantasy. Why? Just to be a pain in the ass? What's up CoastalGenius! |
98719497 | over 4 years ago | This changeset and all of your other ones have fantasy mapping written all over it. You wouldn't happen to know a user named CoastalGenius would you? |
86219021 | over 4 years ago | Why are these all tagged as service roads? I'm cleaning some up, but these are obviously minimally new residential roads. |
92091187 | over 4 years ago | Hello, thanks for contributing roads for this new subdivision in Florida. These roads should be classified as residential vs service, since the roads were built to serve houses which will soon be built here. |
85001909 | about 5 years ago | Thanks for adding the new roads - FYI these are new residential roads, not service. I have corrected the issue. |
61784219 | about 5 years ago | I think it has to do with iD showing you there is a large hydro polygon that has not been completely downloaded. As you move around, more of the polygon gets loaded and the line changes position. After you completely load the closed polygon, it should go away. In this area, there may be a very large polygon involved, so it may never totally go away. JOSM shows a similar "ghost line" as well. In JOSM you have the ability to load a complete geometry, which should make it go away. So bottom line, I don't think it has anything to do with something I've edited, rather the way the editors are showing large incomplete polygons. |
61784219 | about 5 years ago | Hi JDD 3 - I took a quick look around the area of this changeset via JOSM, iD and KeepRight and not seeing anything unusual. Not sure what you mean - further explain? |
84271894 | about 5 years ago | I changed your edit of motorway to primary back to motorway. That stretch of highway has been motorway for 7 years. Lots of people have reviewed that section of road and left it as is. |
84115630 | over 5 years ago | Hi john2660, why did you tag single family houses as offices? |
84021207 | over 5 years ago | Hi olgaderasmo, welcome to OSM! Its great that you added building footprints. My main comments / critique is the geometry can be aligned to the aerial better, don't include a changeset comment hashtag as the building name, and please add the building address info if you know it. In the OSM editor Id - with a building outline selected, the q button will straighten edges of of polygon to make it more square and help with aligning geometry. |
84021346 | over 5 years ago | Hi JamesBarrus - your OSM edit looks good to me. Always add addresses to buildings if you can. Commercial and retail buildings sometimes have multiple addresses and you can add a building outline and add points for the businesses inside the building with separate names, types, addresses, etc. Same for multi-family residential, although unit numbers aren't as important. Building names or identifiers are important in that case. In other cases like a school or hospital, address and other info can be added to a an area polygon that defines the school grounds for instance. Thanks. |
84227171 | over 5 years ago | Hi Ltmapper - this is great info you are adding to OSM. Also adding complete info with addresses, phone numbers, website, etc is very helpful. You may want to try adding building outlines as well if you see a building but its not on the map. The business points of interest can go inside the building outline. Thanks! |
80883131 | over 5 years ago | Welcome to OSM! Overall looks great. Usually if there is one building and one business inside it, put all the info on the building way. But leaving extra info off the building and just putting it on a point is fine, too - just don't duplicate the info on both the building and a point. Either way its important and useful to have the building outline and associated business info. |
78148739 | over 5 years ago | Just an FYI - you forgot to delete two old tennis courts after adding service roads on top of them - also missed an old turning circle. I deleted them. |
76865417 | over 5 years ago | Building import gone bad? |
74134627 | over 5 years ago | These new residential streets should not be tagged as service streets. |
66811339 | almost 6 years ago | Hi 3yoda - I would highly recommend using ESRI World Imagery as default imagery for digitizing. In Florida, Bing tends to be more out of date and not as spatially accurate. |
54259328 | over 6 years ago | Please be careful when considering changing Residential to Service. Southeast Denver Avenue is definitely not a service street. Service streets generally service buildings within a single property. Please refer to osm.wiki/Key:highway |
63045573 | over 6 years ago | Please be careful when considering changing Residential to Service. Osceola Street is definitely not a service street. Service streets generally service buildings within a single property. Please refer to osm.wiki/Key:highway |
57179802 | almost 7 years ago | Hello - to create a link between the one-way segments of a highway, please don't just copy all of the tags associated with one of the segments. If you do that, you have all kinds of attributes associated with the link that does not apply. |