Hi Freebeer,

I have made the change as per your suggestion and we are also looking for patterns in the same.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Freebeer,

Thanks for the update, we have fixed this issue - changeset #: 72933939.
Please keep us posted on another issues.

Regards,
Ganesh

Thanks a lot Horza for your update. We have not used it. But we will definitely look into Duval property and see how we can use them to make our edits better.
Please let us know if you have any other suggestions.
Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Freebeer,
Thanks a lot for your continuous support. Please let us know if you have more suggestions.

Hi Freebeer,

Thanks for the update.

Hi Freebeer,
Thanks a lot for pointing out the issue. We have passed on the message to our team and asked them to check for repetition of this issue so we can have a tab on it and fix them immediately.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Sannkc,

Thanks a lot for your suggestion. As mentioned in the other comment, we will definitely take this up and perform our analysis and get back to you at the earliest.

Please continue to provide your valuable suggestions that will help us further improve our edits.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Sannkc,

Thanks a lot for your suggestion. We will definitely take this up and perform our analysis and get back to you at the earliest.

Please continue to provide your valuable suggestions that will help us further improve our edits.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi TravGW,

Thanks for your advise. I have removed the private access to the service road.Changeset #72868182

Please let us know if you have any other suggestions. Looking forward to learning from you.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi TravGW,

Thanks for your suggestion. I have gone ahead and removed the private access to the aforementioned road segments.
changeset #: 72867693

Please let us know if you have any other suggestions. Looking forward to learning from you.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Freebeer,

Apologies for the mistake. It was an honest mistake from the editor. I have had a quick chat with him. The edit comments for this chageset should be "added service roads and driveways along Bower road ".

Please let us know if you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi freebeer,

Thanks for the follow-up. I have connected the roads as per the latest digital globe imagery - July 2019 and connected the roads.
Changeset #72643945

Please let me know your suggestions.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Georg V,

Thanks a lot for your update. As you suggested there is a little ambiguity/clarity in the aerial imageries.
Thanks a lot for dropping notes. Looking forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
Ganesh

Thanks Paul for the quick update.
I have reverted the motor vehicle access back to NO. Changeset #72251390.

Please let us know if you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi User_5359,

(Responding on behalf of iggujja)
Iggujja did not make the connections at the above mentioned points because the latest satellite imagery (ESRI World imagery - March 2018) shows presence of some barriers/gates.
The roads could have been connected with an assumption that by july 2019 the construction would have been completed. But we do not have any proof to make that edit.

Can you please help us with your advise/suggestion on how to go about this issue? We are eager to work with the community to learn and further improve our edits.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Paul,

(Responding on behalf of sushredd)
The highway was tagged as residential, however it had an access=no tag. However from the aerial imagery, vehicular movement can be observed along with a presence of a parking lot which has presence of vehicles as well.
The access=No tag could not be removed as that could mean access is yes for all.
Hence only the motor vehicle tag was added.

Please let us know your suggestions so that we can edit better.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Cryptickryptos,

Thanks for your update. Alivelis added the service road based on the resources (Digital globe premium - 2015 which is the latest satellite imagery) available in OSM. We acknowledge the local knowledge that you possess and thanks again for helping us with your inputs.
Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Bielebog,

Our editor added vehicle=No to the parking aisles as the main entrance to the parking aisles is from Merschweg which has Vehicle= no.
However that cannot be used to make the parking aisles as Vehicle=no as it will render the parking useless (as mentioned by you).
We had a quick connect with the editor and briefed them on the same.
We have reverted the edit.

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Ganesh

Local knowledge. I personally know the area.

Regards,
Ganesh

Hi Jan,

Thanks for the update. The Turn restriction exception should have been added to the Relation and not the road itself as you suggested. We have retrained our editor and will ensure highest quality of edits.

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Ganesh