OpenStreetMap 标志 OpenStreetMap

电子邮件图标 Bluesky图标 Facebook图标 LinkedIn图标 Mastodon图标 Telegram图标 X图标

讨论

orienteerer2009年12月11日 04:13 的评论

I think this an example of an import done poorly. The imported mines do not even have names imported with them. They were all called "Mine." I would suggest that the import be reversed until it can be done better (keeping the names).
Also imports of a significant scale should be documented on the wiki at: osm.wiki/Import

h4ck3rm1k32009年12月11日 08:21 的评论

Yes, I am working on fixing this import. The names will be updated. We can reverse them and I will reimport. Otherwise just wait and i am fixing my merge script. Sorry about that, josm killed the names on me!

h4ck3rm1k32009年12月11日 08:47 的评论

osm.wiki/Potential_Datasources#National I have documented the sources that I found interesting on data.gov and will be fixing the names today.

h4ck3rm1k32009年12月11日 12:04 的评论

I have reworked a dirt hack version of my merger.
What it does is use the note field to uniquely define what nodes are unique. It takes an osm file that contains the badly named node with ids and the orginal nodes with negative ids in it.
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kosova/%2Bjunk/openstreetmapkosova/revision/96#merge_duplicates_formines.pl

h4ck3rm1k32009年12月11日 12:57 的评论

Ok, I have done a big update on the names
osm.org/browse/changeset/3348720 and others.

Please report any problems.
mike

登录以留下评论